Yeshiva
Beit Midrash
- Sections
- Chemdat Yamim
- P'ninat Mishpat
Appeal and Appeal Ruling: Partial Breach of Contract: Appeal claim: Beit din ruled that def breached the contract by making new obligations in regard to fees for renting the building, yet beit din did not obligate def to pay, deciding that they did not breach the contract. That is a contradiction!
Appeal ruling: Had pl decided to continue with the transfer and def had continued to make demands not set out from the outset, pl would have had a good claim, and beit din would have to decide between enforcing the original agreement and nulling the agreement. However, pl decided to close before the rental period even began, and it is clear from many indications (ed. note – beyond our space limitations) that it was not out of fear of the rental conditions but for fundamental reasons unrelated to any breach of agreement on def’s side. In a relationship between parties to a broad agreement, the existence of an isolated or an attempted breach or breach of contract is not grounds to undo the whole agreement. In this case, a demand of money not yet due, when there was still time to work out the issue, is not a fatal breach of contract, requiring penalizing the potential breacher. Therefore, beit din was correct.
Granting a Problematic Witness Outsized Prominence: Appeal claim: In an important matter, beit din relied exclusively on the testimony of pl’s fired director, even though he was only one witness and had enmity toward pl.
Appeal ruling: The original beit din ruled like the Shulchan Aruch (Choshen Mishpat 33:1) that an "enemy" of the litigant is valid to testify. Beit din also analyzed the testimony’s content and found it credible. The Rambam (Sanhedrin 24:1) empowers a dayan to rule based on what he becomes convinced of even if it does conform to the rules of witnesses. Admittedly, he discouraged using this practically because it is rare that a beit din can presume that ability. While is limitation is accepted, the Rama (Shut 33), the Tumim (90:14), and the Pitchei Teshuva (CM 15:9) allow for limited use of the concept. Consider also that beit din did not rely on the testimony alone. Beit din has the right to decide how much weight to give the witness as a person and based on content. This is especially so in a case like this, where it was done to deflect an attempt to extract money from a defendant.
P'ninat Mishpat (834)
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit
825 - P'ninat Mishpat: Dividing Parents’ Resources when Mother Still Alive
826 - P'ninat Mishpat: Unsuccessful Transfer of Yeshiva – part V
827 - P'ninat Mishpat: How Many Dayanim?
Load More
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit
P'ninat Mishpat Limits of Interest Rate for Loan with Heter Iska – part I
based on ruling 80033 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
P'ninat Mishpat Repercussions of a Sale That Turned Out Not Happening – part II
(based on ruling 83045 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
Igrot Hare’aya Connecting Disciplines in Torah Study
Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook 103 – part III
P'ninat Mishpat Who Breached the Contract? – part IV
Based on ruling 81087 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: Late and Flawed Apartment
based on ruling 82174 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: Agricultural Water Rights – part II
based on ruling 84122 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: A Contractor’s Leaving the Job in the Middle – part II
based on ruling 84013 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
Rabbis in Midrash
Lessons
fast navigation
Hosha'ana Rabba FLYDUBAI & HOSHANA RABBA- ANI VAHU HOSHIA NA- I & HIM SAVE US
"Ani vaHu Hoshia Na", "I and Him, Save Us". We don't just pray to Him, but we also pray to and for ourselves that we should emulate and educate our children to have that instinctive altruism with which He created the world. President Trump seemed amused about Yaniv Hayon, our PLUMBER who confidently worked with G-d like Superman (he learned from a pilot on a TV show!) to save 174 lives on the Dubai hijacking, but we in Israel are totally accustomed already 78 years to our plumbers, teachers, garbage-men, rabbis, farmers & doctors being Hashem's shlichim! This is what Zionism is about.
Moreshet Shaul Hashem Is your Shadow – part I
Based on Siach Shaul, Pirkei Machshava V’Hadracha p. 420 – an address from 1941
P'ninat Mishpat A Non-Contractor in Changing Times – part I
(based on ruling 85128 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
Moreshet Shaul Our King on Rosh Hashana, Our Father on Yom Kippur.
Based on Aroch Siach, p. 221 (Rav Shaul Yisraeli)
