Shabbat and Teshuva

Harav Shaul Yisraeli – condensed from Aroch Si’ach, pp. 238-242

Harav Shaul Yisraeli – condensed from Aroch Si’ach, pp. 238-242

A Request for Turkish Protection

Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook:– #169

Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook:– #169

Arrangements to Deal with Destabilizing Renovations

(based on ruling 82092 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)

(based on ruling 82092 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)

The Need for Torah Devotees to Write on Jewish Philosophy

Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook:#164 – part III

Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook:#164 – part III

How Much Pay for the Fired Lawyer?

part II

part II

The Need for Torah Devotees to Write on Jewish Philosophy

Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook: #164 – part II

Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook: #164 – part II

How Much Pay for the Fired Lawyer? – part I

P'ninat Mishpat: Disagreement on Length of Rental Commitment – part II

(based on ruling 83043 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)

(based on ruling 83043 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)

The Need for Torah Devotees to Write on Jewish Philosophy

Igrot Hare’aya: Letters of Rav Kook #164 – part I

Igrot Hare’aya: Letters of Rav Kook #164 – part I

Celebration of Quarters for Yemenite Community

Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook: #162

With a rejoicing of the heart and thanks, I received your pleasant invitation to the celebration of the cornerstone placing for the houses for our brothers, the Yemenite workers. You know how close this wonderful matter is to my heart and how happy I was when this approached fruition. You also know how much I wanted to be present at your holy celebration and take part in its joyousness – a happiness of mitzva. I am greatly disappointed that the eye disease that has attacked me in the last few days prevents my fulfilling my desire. Therefore, I am compelled to make due with expressing my warm blessing in writing for our celebration.

Disagreement on Length of Rental Commitment – part I

The defendant (=def), which provides communal medical services, has been renting part of the building of the plaintiff (=pl), an educational institution, for over 20 years. There have been various rental contracts (=rc) for different lengths of time; the last one, written in 2012, includes a clause enabling pl to remove def with one month’s notice. Since then, some draft contracts were exchanged (including, in 2016, rejected by def), and the sides continued the rental based on general oral agreements, with some rent increases. In May 2022, pl told def to vacate their rental area by October because pl expanded their operations and needed the space themselves; def refused to leave. One solution raised was for the two sides to use the area at different hours, but def claimed it was illegal to do so. Def requested a restraining order to prevent pl from moving in. Def argues that only one agreement includes the clause of early removal of def, and it is illogical for such a complicated operation as a medical provider to relocate in a month. Rather, that contract was just a formalistic piece of paper (copied from a standard contract), that did not represent the parties’ essential agreement, as many of its provisions were ignored by the sides.

Appeal to Buy from Religious Winery

Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook #160 – part II

The first part discussed how the early settlers of Eretz Yisrael ranged from simple religious people to the holiest scholars, and that now many of the farmers are irreligious.] We know clearly that many religious Jews are upset [about the decrease in patronizing Jewish products from Eretz Yisrael] and are unable to save the situation. There was especially great disappointment last year, as the inability to sell the wine was so bad, that they reached the point that it was necessary to uproot that which was already planted. This includes multiple vineyards whose owners gave up hope of being able to sell their wine. The sight of the uprooting pierced the heart.

Rights of a Yishuv on Peripheral Land – part I

(based on ruling 80083 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)

(based on ruling 80083 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)

Contractors Fixing their Damages

Based on ruling 82015 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts

Based on ruling 82015 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts

Appeal to Buy from Religious Winery

Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook #160 – part I

Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook #160 – part I

Seeking the Return of Religious Aliya

Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook #159 – part II

Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook #159 – part II

The Binding Nature of the Tentative Agreement – part II

Based on ruling 82108 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts

Based on ruling 82108 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts

Seeking the Return of Religious Aliya

Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook #159 – part I

Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook #159 – part I

The Binding Nature of the Tentative Agreement – part I

Based on ruling 82108 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts

Based on ruling 82108 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts

Realtor Fee Without a Contract – part II