YeshivaThe torah world Gateway
Beit Midrash
- Sections
- Chemdat Yamim
- P'ninat Mishpat
The first contract includes interest and the second refers to "benefits" for pl; both refer to a standard heter iska. In actuality, bank transfers indicate that the sums are 255,720 NIS and 170,350 NIS respectively (=426,070). This is confirmed by a statement by pl that the contract sums are rounded off. The sides disagree how to consider the loan amounts and conditions. There are also disputes between the sides about what various payments by def, some direct and some indirect (def paying a person to whom pl owed money) relate to. Def claimed they were to pay for the first loan; pl claimed they were for the second loan and/or additional debts that def had to pl.
Ruling: The amount of the loans that is the principal is 426,070 NIS, not the 500,000 NIS written in the contracts, as pl admitted they were rounded off. However, regarding the 5,720 NIS of the first loan that exceeded the 250,000 NIS listed in the loan contract, nothing indicates that it is interest-bearing.
The basic rule applied here is that when two loans are given at different times, payment of the earlier loan is to be assumed before payment of the later loan. This is all the more logical in a case where the first loan bears interest.
The second contract states that part of pl’s salary would be paid in the form of corresponding forgiving of the first loan. It became clear that this was done to get out of paying taxes, for the "benefit" of both sides. This is forbidden according to Israeli law and according to Halacha (Shulchan Aruch, Choshen Mishpat 369:6). Despite this, regarding the financial situation between the sides, those payments will be considered payment of the first loan.
Although pl said those payments corresponded to other of def’s obligations to him, since during all the hearings, pl did not mention other debts, this claim is quite implausible. Furthermore, claiming that payment was for an undocumented loan (sitrai), not the documented one, is believed only if the claimant could have denied the payment (Shvuot 42a). Acharonim say this is true not only when there are witnesses to payments, but also when the litigant admitted the payments, as pl did. Pl counters that there is a clause in the contract that pl is believed to say that his loan was not paid back unless he signs a receipt that it was. However, the Shach (CM 58:11) says that this ability to claim non-payment falls off when the recipient previously admitted that he received it, as was the case here.
P'ninat Mishpat (827)
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit
841 - P'NINAT MISHPAT: TO WHOM DO THE PAYMENTS GO? – PART II
842 - P'NINAT MISHPAT: A MESS OF LOANS, REPAYMENTS AND GRIEVANCES – PART I
843 - P'NINAT MISHPAT: A Mess of Loans, Repayments and Grievances – part II
Load More
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit
Igrot Hare’aya Semi-solicited Advice to Calm Down Petach Tikva
#227 Date and Place: 8 Tishrei 5669, Yafo
Igrot Hare’aya Departure of an Uncle to Eretz Yisrael
Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook: Vol. I, #1 , p. 1-2 – part II
P'ninat Mishpat Payment for Not Clearing Warehouse On Time – part II
based on ruling 75076 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: How Many Dayanim?
based on ruling 84139-1 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: Smoking Rights in a Rental? – part I
based on ruling 85076 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: Agricultural Water Rights – part II
based on ruling 84122 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: A Seller with Questionable Rights to the Property – part II
based on ruling 84062 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
Rabbis in Midrash
Lessons
fast navigation
The Land of Israel LGBT'S IN ISRAEL
The question was asked, how can one make Aliyah with the LGBT parades?
Kuzari -Rabbi Ari Shvat Kuzari class 7 - Five Accumulative Proofs of G-d
As a preparation for the Kuzari's classic proof of G-d from the mass-revelation at Sinai, we start here with 5 other directions to strengthen our belief which also contribute to what the Kuzari will present as well.
Ein Aya Muscle & Meaning: The Dual Nature of Gevurah (Physical Strength)
Is physical strength and fitness a necessity or an ideal? Although it if often totally overlooked among topics of Judaism, Rav Kook writes that it clearly is also a necessity to deter the many enemies of Israel, but even in Y'mot HaMashiach, in the Messianic era, to a certain extent, it's ideal continues even after our enemies will have been finished off.
Chukat "HOW ENTEBBE STOLE THE BICENTENNIAL
The Difference Between Historic & Eternal"
As we approach America's 250th birthday, it's worth remembering her 200th Bicentennial birthday, on Jul. 4th 1976, when Israel "stole the show" by shocking the world & miraculously saving 101 hostages in a foreign continent. As Pres. As Pres. Trump decides which countries get priority in his new Middle-East, it's worth reminding him of the difference between historic events and eternally historic ones. This obviously connects with this week's parsha, as well!
Kuzari -Rabbi Ari Shvat Kuzari class 6 - The Parable of the King of India
The advantages of testimony over circumstantial evidence or philosophical speculation.
Kuzari -Rabbi Ari Shvat Kuzari class 5- "Proofs of G-d"
This may be the most important class of the entire book, where we finally get to the Jewish proof of the existence of G-d and truth of the Torah. We should follow His own direction where He tells us how to get to Him: through the Nation of Israel: Jewish history, Jewish prophets (and today, prophecies fulfilled), and national reward & punishment towards Am Yisrael.
Ein Aya One Humanity, One Creator, One Jerusalem
Rav Kook innovatively and beautifully explains this aggadeta where our sages say that after Jerusalem was destroyed her cinnamon fragrance is only found locked in a particular kingdom's treasury.
