- Sections
- Parashat Hashavua
A Schemer Who Missed the Message of Tzara’at
In the last few weeks, we learned how David’s nephew Yonadav ben Shama ostensibly was trying to help David’s son Amnon fulfill his desire but was actually trying to cause problems in David’s family that would enable him to become king. This week we will see that Achitofel did a similar thing – while ostensibly helping Avshalom take over the kingdom from his father, David, Achitofel was actually manipulating to pave the way for his own kingdom. We will approach the matter through the topic of tzara’at (leprosy), which is so much at the heart of our parshiyot.
In the last few weeks, we learned how David’s nephew Yonadav ben Shama ostensibly was trying to help David’s son Amnon fulfill his desire but was actually trying to cause problems in David’s family that would enable him to become king. This week we will see that Achitofel did a similar thing – while ostensibly helping Avshalom take over the kingdom from his father, David, Achitofel was actually manipulating to pave the way for his own kingdom. We will approach the matter through the topic of tzara’at (leprosy), which is so much at the heart of our parshiyot.
The Torah prohibits cutting off tzara’at lesions from the skin. An exception is if the tzara’at is on the skin that must be removed as part of a brit mila (Shabbat 132b), as the great mitzva of mila pushes off the prohibition.
The gemara (Sanhedrin 101b) relates that there were three (groups of) people who thought they received a reliable prophecy but were mistaken. One was Nevat, the father of Yeravam. A second (a group) were the astrologers of Pharaoh. The third was Achitofel. Achitofel was mistaken in regard to the tzara’at that he saw on his male organ. He thought that this was a sign that he would be king, while in truth it was a sign that he would have a descendent who would be king (Shlomo’s mother, Batsheva, was Achitofel’s granddaughter).
The Yad Rama (ad loc.) develops Achitofel’s thought process and actions. Achitofel decided to support Avshalom’s rebellion because he figured that he did not have a chance to dethrone David, who was brave, wise, and popular with the people. He reasoned that he could be a simple advisor to Avshalom in his removal of David, and later he could dethrone Avshalom, who lacked his father’s positive attributes.
Achitofel was himself an unprecedented Torah authority. "The counsel of Achitofel in those days was like asking for the word of Hashem" (Shmuel II, 16:23). So it is not shocking that he saw great things for himself, and he even believed that the tzara’at at the place of the mila was a sign that he would have unusual fertility, which he connected to great leadership. He did not realize that the hint was the opposite, that tzara’at should remind one to make himself humble, just as the mila instructs a person to curb his desires.
Returning to his mistake, Achitofel thought that he had a better chance at rebelling against Avshalom if he succeeded at overthrowing David. It is easier to be a legitimate alternative to someone who had slept with his father’s concubines than to rebel against a brave tzaddik. Achitofel had a good plan for Avshalom: attack David while he was down and before he had a chance to regroup and renew support for himself. It took divine intervention to overcome the plan, as the navi writes explicitly (Shmuel II, 17:14). When Achitofel saw that his plan was ruined from Above, he gave up all hope and went home and committed suicide (ibid. 23).
We learn once more that the road to kingship runs through humility. It was David, who referred to himself as "a worm and not a man" (Tehillim 22:7). Achitofel was not fit to be king, as he was one who would do whatever he could, including acting immorally, in order to attain the coveted title.
The Torah prohibits cutting off tzara’at lesions from the skin. An exception is if the tzara’at is on the skin that must be removed as part of a brit mila (Shabbat 132b), as the great mitzva of mila pushes off the prohibition.
The gemara (Sanhedrin 101b) relates that there were three (groups of) people who thought they received a reliable prophecy but were mistaken. One was Nevat, the father of Yeravam. A second (a group) were the astrologers of Pharaoh. The third was Achitofel. Achitofel was mistaken in regard to the tzara’at that he saw on his male organ. He thought that this was a sign that he would be king, while in truth it was a sign that he would have a descendent who would be king (Shlomo’s mother, Batsheva, was Achitofel’s granddaughter).
The Yad Rama (ad loc.) develops Achitofel’s thought process and actions. Achitofel decided to support Avshalom’s rebellion because he figured that he did not have a chance to dethrone David, who was brave, wise, and popular with the people. He reasoned that he could be a simple advisor to Avshalom in his removal of David, and later he could dethrone Avshalom, who lacked his father’s positive attributes.
Achitofel was himself an unprecedented Torah authority. "The counsel of Achitofel in those days was like asking for the word of Hashem" (Shmuel II, 16:23). So it is not shocking that he saw great things for himself, and he even believed that the tzara’at at the place of the mila was a sign that he would have unusual fertility, which he connected to great leadership. He did not realize that the hint was the opposite, that tzara’at should remind one to make himself humble, just as the mila instructs a person to curb his desires.
Returning to his mistake, Achitofel thought that he had a better chance at rebelling against Avshalom if he succeeded at overthrowing David. It is easier to be a legitimate alternative to someone who had slept with his father’s concubines than to rebel against a brave tzaddik. Achitofel had a good plan for Avshalom: attack David while he was down and before he had a chance to regroup and renew support for himself. It took divine intervention to overcome the plan, as the navi writes explicitly (Shmuel II, 17:14). When Achitofel saw that his plan was ruined from Above, he gave up all hope and went home and committed suicide (ibid. 23).
We learn once more that the road to kingship runs through humility. It was David, who referred to himself as "a worm and not a man" (Tehillim 22:7). Achitofel was not fit to be king, as he was one who would do whatever he could, including acting immorally, in order to attain the coveted title.

Zaken Mamreh
Rabbi Yossef Carmel | 4 Elul 5767

All Citizens in Israel
From V’samachta B’chagecha, p. 6
Rabbi Shaul Yisraeli zt"l | 12 Tishrei 5784

He Did not Look at Iniquity in Jacob
Rabbi Yossef Carmel | Tammuz 5783

Parashat Vayera: The Danger of Sinful Contemplation
From the Chemdat Yamim Leaflet

Rabbi Yossef Carmel
Head of "Eretz Hemda" Dayanut Kollel

The Nazir’s Sacrifice
Parashat Naso
Sivan 5763

The Danger of the Fear of High Places
Parashat Vayetze
5764

The Two Countings of the Nation, Yom Haatzmaut and Yom Yerushalayim
Iyar 26 5777

Seeing the Bow
5772

The Prohibition of Chanufah
Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff
4. The Three Oaths
Chapter 4: Yom Ha-atzma’ut
Rabbi Eliezer Melamed | Cheshvan 4 5782

The Connection Between Chanukah and Sukkot
Rabbi Yossef Carmel | Kislev 5767

Finding a Compatible Place for an Extended Family Outing
Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff | 5771

How the Four Places Called "Zion" are All the Same
Rabbi Moshe Tzuriel | 4 Kislev 5784
The Attributes of Truth and Eternity: One and the Same
Rabbi Zalman Baruch Melamed | 11 Kislev 5784

Orot Hamilchama- part 3
Rabbi Ari Shvat
