YeshivaThe torah world Gateway
Beit Midrash
- Sections
- Chemdat Yamim
- Bemare Habazak - Rabbis Questions
- Family and Society
- The Jewish Household
- Women in Judaism
I don’t understand why a woman cannot blow shofar on behalf of a man, if he personally hears the shofar being blown?
Answer: Firstly, let us confirm that your assumption is not only correct but is unanimously agreed upon. Indeed the mishna (Rosh Hashana 29a) says that one who is not obligated in the mitzva of shofar is unable to blow on behalf of one who is obligated to fulfill their mitzva, and all agree that women are exempt from the mitzva of shofar because it is a time-linked mitzva (see Kiddushin 29a and Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chayim 589:3).
Your question is an excellent one, according to an understanding that many but not all authorities have. You seem to assume that the mitzva is to hear shofar blowing, not to blow the shofar. The Rambam writes in this vein in several places (see Shofar 1:1). The Tur (OC 585) provides two indications that the mitzva is to hear: 1) the language of the beracha is: "… He commanded us to hear the sound of the shofar." The halacha is that if one blew the shofar into a pit in a manner that he was not able to hear his own blowing, he does not fulfill the mitzva (see Rosh Hashana 28a). According to this approach, your question is logical: if one heard an authentic shofar sound, what difference does it make who produced it?
On the other hand, there are dissenters to this approach to different degrees. The Rosh (Rosh Hashana 4:10) cites Rabbeinu Tam as saying that the mitzva is to blow. He is not bothered by the language of the beracha, as Rabbeinu Tam’s version of the beracha was indeed "… on the blowing of the shofar." One can explain the need to hear the blowing by saying that while the essence of the mitzva is to blow the shofar, there is also a condition in the mitzva’s fulfillment that one hears it. Another simple question Rabbeinu Tam has to deal with is: if the mitzva is to blow, why don’t we all have to blow? One cannot answer that the ba’al tokeiah is our shaliach (agent) for the fulfillment of the mitzva because if agency was effective, then one could have someone blow for him without even being present to hear the blowing. In fact, the mitzva of shofar is a mitzva shebegufo, a mitzva that one must perform personally, just that we can apply the rule of shomeiah k’oneh (he who hears is like one who recites), which we find in contexts such as the reading of the Megilla. In other words, one who hears the sound of the shofar being blown is like one who produces the sound. Shomeiah k’oneh requires the reciter to be obligated in the mitzva, and thus according to Rabbeinu Tam we understand why a woman cannot blow shofar for a man. In contrast, the Rambam does not need to employ shomeiah k’oneh, as the hearing each person does himself suffices.
Yet your question does not disprove the Rambam’s approach. The mitzva can be to hear the sound, but not any shofer sound, but specifically a ‘mitzva- connected’ sound, which can be produced only by someone who is obligated in the mitzva. It is similar to tefillin. While the mitzva is to wear tefillin, not write them, only one who has the mitzva to wear tefillin can write them. What is very difficult for the Rambam is why the person blowing must have in mind that his blowing can be used by others in order for them fulfill the mitzva (Rosh Hashana 29a). After all, the sound is mitzva-connected because he is using it for his own mitzva or that of his friends, so why doesn’t everyone who hears that mitzva sound with his own correct intentions fulfill the mitzva by hearing it? (The Chazon Ish’s (OC 29:4) answer is beyond our scope).
According to a third approach, the essential mitzva is both blowing and hearing (see Minchat Chinuch #405). Therefore a man who hears from a woman is missing at least one element of the mitzva, being connected to the blowing of one who is obligated in shofar.
Bemare Habazak - Rabbis Questions (657)
Various Rabbis
30 - netilat yadayim
31 - Why Can’t Women Blow the Shofar for Men?
32 - Taking Interest that Accompanies Tax Refunds
Load More
Bemare Habazak - Rabbis Questions Ask the Rabbi: Forgot to Remove Tefillin Before Musaf of Rosh Chodesh
P'ninat Mishpat Complaints about Contractor’s Work – part II
(based on ruling 83037.1 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: Realtor’s Fee on Large Commercial Building – part I
(based on ruling 85031 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
Rabbis in Midrash
Lessons
fast navigation
Shoftim TESHUVA IN COURT OF LAW?
Parshat Shoftim-Chodesh Elul
Why does parshat Shoftim always come out during Elul? This innovative and central explanation is an eye-opener regarding many aspects of Judaism.
The Month of Elul TESHUVA IS THE ANSWER
The month of Elul serves as a vital time for self-reflection and personal accountability to prepare for true repentance.
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: Realtor’s Fee on Large Commercial Building – part I
(based on ruling 85031 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
(based on ruling 85031 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
P'ninat Mishpat Complaints about Contractor’s Work – part II
(based on ruling 83037.1 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
(based on ruling 83037.1 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
Chemdat Yamim Moreshet Shaul: The Goal of an Agricultural Yeshiva – part I
Based on Siach Shaul, Pirkei Machshava V’Hadracha p. 263 (address at the laying of the cornerstone of the Yeshiva Chakla’it in Kfar Haroeh)
Based on Siach Shaul, Pirkei Machshava V’Hadracha p. 263 (address at the laying of the cornerstone of the Yeshiva Chakla’it in Kfar Haroeh)
Chemdat Yamim The Goal of an Agricultural Yeshiva – part II
Based on Siach Shaul, Pirkei Machshava V’Hadracha p. 263 (address at the cornerstone laying for the Yeshiva Chakla’it in Kfar Haroeh – 1938)
Based on Siach Shaul, Pirkei Machshava V’Hadracha p. 263 (address at the cornerstone laying for the Yeshiva Chakla’it in Kfar Haroeh – 1938)
Re'e NEVER EXTREME EXCEPT ISRAEL
Parshat Re'eh
Judaism is against extremism, so how can we understand the seemingly extreme statements found in our sages in favor of living in the Land of Israel and against living in Chutz laAretz? The article deals with the seeming contradiction between the strength of Free-Will and the strength of being influenced by our surroundings.
Ekev DANCE FOR ISRAEL- FOR YOUR BENEFIT
Parshat Eikev
Description: The 7 Haftarot we read after Tisha B'Av ("Shiva D'Nichemta") surely get us excited that they're coming TRUE, and awaken us to yearn, dance & join the return to Zion! The short article also deals with the problems and solutions facing the American Jewish community as discussed at a recent panel, as well as the question why Jews come from America to Israel to help when we face problems, but Israelis don't come to aid Jews in America when they face anti-Semitism.
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: Complaints about Contractor’s Work – part II
(based on ruling 83037.1 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
(based on ruling 83037.1 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
Chemdat Yamim Moreshet Shaul: Twin Foundations
Based on Siach Shaul, Pirkei Machshava V’Hadracha p. 690
Based on Siach Shaul, Pirkei Machshava V’Hadracha p. 690
