YeshivaThe torah world Gateway Beit Midrash
Beit Midrash
- Sections
- Chemdat Yamim
- Bemare Habazak - Rabbis Questions
Answer: We bend or break normal rules in order to make Purim "lively" in multiple ways. There are the ideas of drinking wine well beyond the norm and that one is exempt from payment for damages caused during the Purim celebration because the mayhem is part of the mitzva (Rama, Orach Chayim 695:2). Regarding Megilla reading, the minhag that the congregation reads out loud four p’sukim was designed "just for happiness, to make the youngsters happy, and encourage them to … listen to the reading" (Hagahot Maimoniot, Megilla 1:7). There, words are being said in a fundamentally unnecessary manner, but they are the words of the Megilla. The idea of putting down Haman finds expression in several statements of Chazal.
Is showing disdain for Haman grounds to bend any rules? The practices of "banging for Haman" has undergone changes over time, but is codified in the Rama (Orach Chayim 690:17). Normally, it is forbidden to do actions in a juncture where hefsek is forbidden (Shulchan Aruch, OC 97:4 regarding returning a tallit that fell off). Much of the non-vocal noisemaking is as much of an action, so we see a bending of the rules. However, hefsek exists on a scale, and speech is at its top (Mishna Berura 104:10), so we must look for precedent for speaking due to Haman’s name.
The Magen Avraham (690:21) cites a minhag from the Levush (OC 690:17) to say "Shem resha’im yirkav" when Haman’s name is read, so there is indeed strong precedent. While "boo" lacks the profundity of words from Tanach, the fundamental underpinnings seem the same. On the other hand, the Pri Megadim (ad loc.) criticizes the practice, and it is not cited in the body of the Mishna Berura. In its footnotes (Sha’ar Hatziyun 690:57), he explains that he opposes the practice – however, his grounds (like the Pri Megadim’s; they both disapproved the pause in the laining) are that the confusion the proclamation brings can cause one to miss part of the leining. However, he suggests the following proof that hefsek is not a problem. The Shulchan Aruch (ibid. 13) validates a practice to elucidate the Megilla reading during the reading; in other words, with proper justification, one can speak things related to the reading. Igrot Moshe (OC I 192) discusses a deflection of the proof, and leaves the propriety of the Levush’s minhag unresolved. Regarding the complaint about confusion, in most shuls, vocalization is not going to "push the envelope" (see Living the Halachic Process VI, D-11).
Is wordless vocalization better than speaking with word(s)? Poskim treat communicating through remiza (hinting) as normally a problem, but when needed, preferable to speaking or even moving from one’s place during Shemoneh Esrei (Mishna Berura 104:1). That refers to hinting with hands or eyes, not to vocalization. Although I have not found a source for it, it is a longstanding practice (probably overused) for when you must not speak to say "Nu, nu" with gestures and intonations, meaning, "Do as I expect you to understand." This is apparently worse than remiza and better than speaking. In some ways, "Boo" is more like speech, as the interjection "boo" is an entry in dictionaries and has a specific meaning (of disapproval), whereas "Nu" can mean anything, depending on context and intonation. If stretched out greatly, "Boooo" is more of a sound than a word, making it is more similar to "Nu." Animal sounds are definitely not speaking, and would be not too different from mechanical noisemaking.
In summary, there are enough ways to put down Haman without the more problematic use of words. On the other hand, words might be okay, even unrelated speech does not disqualify Megilla reading (Rama, OC 690:5), and cramping children’s style has a price. Each shul/rabbi should act according to its character and the religious/experiential needs of the Purim celebrants.
Bemare Habazak - Rabbis Questions (654)
Rabbi Daniel Mann
673 - Ask the Rabbi: Late Payment?
674 - Ask the Rabbi: Booing Haman
675 - Ask the Rabbi: Gluten-Free Diet and Shabbat Considerations
Load More
Lessons
fast navigation

Kuzari -Rabbi Ari Shvat Kuzari class 9 - "Seeing is Believing" (parag. 21-30)
These paragraphs elaborate on the theme that seeing and knowing is better than any attempt to prove logically, and begins explaining the difference between Israel and gentiles.

Ein Aya Various Universal Stages of the Geula Process
Rav Kook examines the various stages of redemption, explaining how (in addition to the obvious oft-mentioned stages of ingathering the exiles, reviving the Hebrew language, army, state etc.) the messianic dream of world prosperity, the State of Israel and world unity can and are realistically and logically gradually coming true.

Kuzari -Rabbi Ari Shvat Kuzari class 8- "Answering Questions on the Kuzari's Proof from Mass Revelation
How do we know that the "claim" of mass revelation to 2,000,000 witnesses at Mt. Sinai is really true? This important class answers all of the questions skeptics ask about this claim of the Kuzari.

Ein Aya Armies Still Necessary for Balance & the War Against Wars
Rav Kook explains why the world was originally divided into the various seemingly contradicting ideologies and cultures, in order to develop each one respectively. Swords or armies symbolize how each respective ideology defends themselves, as well as deters their opposing ideologies and cultures. On the other hand, the messianic era will be one of peace, and Rav Kook explains the transition to that stage, which mankind is already undergoing.

The Land of Israel LGBT'S IN ISRAEL
The question was asked, how can one make Aliyah with the LGBT parades?

Kuzari -Rabbi Ari Shvat Kuzari class 7 - Five Accumulative Proofs of G-d
As a preparation for the Kuzari's classic proof of G-d from the mass-revelation at Sinai, we start here with 5 other directions to strengthen our belief which also contribute to what the Kuzari will present as well.

Ein Aya Muscle & Meaning: The Dual Nature of Gevurah (Physical Strength)
Is physical strength and fitness a necessity or an ideal? Although it if often totally overlooked among topics of Judaism, Rav Kook writes that it clearly is also a necessity to deter the many enemies of Israel, but even in Y'mot HaMashiach, in the Messianic era, to a certain extent, it's ideal continues even after our enemies will have been finished off.








