YeshivaThe torah world Gateway
Beit Midrash
- Sections
- Chemdat Yamim
- Bemare Habazak - Rabbis Questions
Answer: We bend or break normal rules in order to make Purim "lively" in multiple ways. There are the ideas of drinking wine well beyond the norm and that one is exempt from payment for damages caused during the Purim celebration because the mayhem is part of the mitzva (Rama, Orach Chayim 695:2). Regarding Megilla reading, the minhag that the congregation reads out loud four p’sukim was designed "just for happiness, to make the youngsters happy, and encourage them to … listen to the reading" (Hagahot Maimoniot, Megilla 1:7). There, words are being said in a fundamentally unnecessary manner, but they are the words of the Megilla. The idea of putting down Haman finds expression in several statements of Chazal.
Is showing disdain for Haman grounds to bend any rules? The practices of "banging for Haman" has undergone changes over time, but is codified in the Rama (Orach Chayim 690:17). Normally, it is forbidden to do actions in a juncture where hefsek is forbidden (Shulchan Aruch, OC 97:4 regarding returning a tallit that fell off). Much of the non-vocal noisemaking is as much of an action, so we see a bending of the rules. However, hefsek exists on a scale, and speech is at its top (Mishna Berura 104:10), so we must look for precedent for speaking due to Haman’s name.
The Magen Avraham (690:21) cites a minhag from the Levush (OC 690:17) to say "Shem resha’im yirkav" when Haman’s name is read, so there is indeed strong precedent. While "boo" lacks the profundity of words from Tanach, the fundamental underpinnings seem the same. On the other hand, the Pri Megadim (ad loc.) criticizes the practice, and it is not cited in the body of the Mishna Berura. In its footnotes (Sha’ar Hatziyun 690:57), he explains that he opposes the practice – however, his grounds (like the Pri Megadim’s; they both disapproved the pause in the laining) are that the confusion the proclamation brings can cause one to miss part of the leining. However, he suggests the following proof that hefsek is not a problem. The Shulchan Aruch (ibid. 13) validates a practice to elucidate the Megilla reading during the reading; in other words, with proper justification, one can speak things related to the reading. Igrot Moshe (OC I 192) discusses a deflection of the proof, and leaves the propriety of the Levush’s minhag unresolved. Regarding the complaint about confusion, in most shuls, vocalization is not going to "push the envelope" (see Living the Halachic Process VI, D-11).
Is wordless vocalization better than speaking with word(s)? Poskim treat communicating through remiza (hinting) as normally a problem, but when needed, preferable to speaking or even moving from one’s place during Shemoneh Esrei (Mishna Berura 104:1). That refers to hinting with hands or eyes, not to vocalization. Although I have not found a source for it, it is a longstanding practice (probably overused) for when you must not speak to say "Nu, nu" with gestures and intonations, meaning, "Do as I expect you to understand." This is apparently worse than remiza and better than speaking. In some ways, "Boo" is more like speech, as the interjection "boo" is an entry in dictionaries and has a specific meaning (of disapproval), whereas "Nu" can mean anything, depending on context and intonation. If stretched out greatly, "Boooo" is more of a sound than a word, making it is more similar to "Nu." Animal sounds are definitely not speaking, and would be not too different from mechanical noisemaking.
In summary, there are enough ways to put down Haman without the more problematic use of words. On the other hand, words might be okay, even unrelated speech does not disqualify Megilla reading (Rama, OC 690:5), and cramping children’s style has a price. Each shul/rabbi should act according to its character and the religious/experiential needs of the Purim celebrants.
Bemare Habazak - Rabbis Questions (649)
Rabbi Daniel Mann
673 - Ask the Rabbi: Late Payment?
674 - Ask the Rabbi: Booing Haman
675 - Ask the Rabbi: Gluten-Free Diet and Shabbat Considerations
Load More
Rabbis in Midrash
Lessons
fast navigation
Shlach Lecha "Why So Many Don't Make Aliya?" - Parshat Shlach
This short article deals with the weird phenomena that every single time Am Yisrael is meant to enter the Land of Israel, throughout the Tanach, 2nd Temple and until today, they "chicken out" and look for excuses. What's the problem with this mitzvah that proves so challenging. The article, based on sources, suggests that the difficulties of Eretz Yisrael is precisely her secret and beauty!
Kuzari -Rabbi Ari Shvat Kuzari class 4
The class deals with Islam and how the Muslim tries convincing the King of the Khazars, and why he was also rejected.
Beha'alotcha JEWISH STATE= GUIDE TO G-DLINESS & SELFLESSNESS
A Jewish State not only is a good idea, but educates us towards selflessness, altruism and G-dliness in our daily lives.
Ein Aya In Zion Even the Smoke of the Bark is Sweet
Just as Jewish nationalism is different from others, so too our capitol of Jerusalem is totally different than other national capitols. Rav Kook beautifully explains the passage in the Talmud that the trees of Yerushalayim were cinnamon trees.
Kuzari -Rabbi Ari Shvat Kuzari class 3
The second speaker invited to convince the Khazar King is the Christian, who presents their beliefs. Even before the questions of the King, "between the lines", the author R. Yehuda HaLevi already begins disproving them.
Ein Aya "Intimacy: Love, Life & Giving or Egocentric Taking & Expiration"
Today, many confuse between intimacy in marriage, based on love, giving and life which are diametrically opposed to empty "sex", pornography and prostitution which destroyed the Beit HaMikdash. The practical importance of clarifying this topic in today's western society is obvious, especially for young adults.
Kuzari -Rabbi Ari Shvat Kuzari class 2
The King of the Kazars, in his search for truth, starts by inviting the philosopher. This is a "crash-course" on Aristotelian philosophy and the reasons why the king is not convinced. Through this dialogue, R. Yehuda HaLevi already foreshadows some of his central ideas that will appear later.
Shavuot "Love of Torah = Love of Israel"- for Shavuot
People often identify Judaism as just a religion, but upon examination, we see, even halachically and explicitly in the siddur, that the Torah is dependent upon Am Yisrael, Jewish nationalism.
Ein Aya The Middle-Child & Anti-Tzni'ut Syndrome- Negative Attention
Although tzni'ut is for men just like women, Rav Kook deals here with the sources in Yishayahu and the Talmud which deals with the special problem of lack of tzni'ut in women's dress and actions, where it's not just a problem of midot and character traits, but also can include practical, social and national ramifications, as well, which caused the destruction of the Beit HaMikdash and exile from Israel. The class continues the previous one (Ayn Aya Shabbat vi, 29), and is a must for all educators and parents of high-school aged and young adults.
P'ninat Mishpat P'NINAT MISHPAT: A Mess of Loans, Repayments and Grievances – part II
based on ruling 83033 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
based on ruling 83033 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
