YeshivaThe torah world Gateway Beit Midrash
Beit Midrash
- Sections
- Chemdat Yamim
- P'ninat Mishpat
Ruling: [Last time we saw that the price estimate, not the plans, are the binding guide for what pl was obligated to do and def was obligated to pay.]
Mekach ta’ut – Mekach ta’ut can void agreements, but it must pass a high bar. Also, after a fair amount of work was done, def came to pl’s house with a payment and a bottle of wine in appreciation for pl’s good work. Pl presented himself as an expert contractor, which def has not refuted. The fact that he made mistakes due to a lack of experience with the location’s unique topography and soil does not mean that he could not learn certain things on the job. One dayan adds that one cannot claim mekach ta’ut based on a blemish that can be fixed without the need to totally discard that which was previously done (see Shulchan Aruch, Choshen Mishpat 232:5), such as the flaws pl was responsible for. Furthermore, even if we were to employ mekach ta’ut, there is still a requirement to pay for the great majority of work, which had value, so the question of mekach ta’ut is close to academic.
After calculations, beit din found that def owes pl 30,233 NIS.
Linkage of debt: Poskim are against linking debts to the CCI because it is not a true indicator of the value of money, and therefore this violates ribbit (usury). This is particularly so here where the delay did not cause pl to encounter more expensive building costs. Regarding linking to the consumer price index (CPI), some base permission to do so on the Yam Shel Shlomo (Bava Kama 9:13), who says that when someone who owed money, inexcusably pushed off the creditor and the currency of the loan changed to a more expensive one, he can be made to pay in the new currency. However, the Shach (CM 74:27) disagrees. In any case, nothing as dramatic as a currency change occurred here. On the other hand, Rav Auerbach (Minchat Shlomo I:27) says that when one does not pay a loan when he was supposed to (ribbit is classically when one returns more money later, based on agreement, not refusal to pay), he needs forgiveness, and increased payment as forgiveness is not ribbit. In this case, instead of linking the payment per se, beit din obligated def 6,000 NIS for taking years to submit to beit din.
P'ninat Mishpat (832)
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit
753 - Profits from Formerly Joint Swimming Pool – part III
754 - Disagreements over Renovations – part II
755 - Damages of Movers
Load More
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit

P'ninat Mishpat A Commercial Rental for a Closed Business – part II
based on ruling 80047 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts

Igrot Hare’aya Connecting Disciplines in Torah Study
Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook 103 – part III

Igrot Hare’aya Raffle of Property in Eretz Yisrael for Tzedaka
Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook: – #220

P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: Tuition Payment after Withdrawing Student
based on ruling 85142 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts

P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: Sharing in Plumbing Expenses – part II
based on ruling 85013 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts

P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: Undoing a Problematic Partnership – part III
based on ruling 84061 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts

P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: Complaints about Contractor’s Work – part II
(based on ruling 83037.1 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
Lessons
fast navigation

Shoftim TESHUVA IN COURT OF LAW?
Parshat Shoftim-Chodesh Elul
Why does parshat Shoftim always come out during Elul? This innovative and central explanation is an eye-opener regarding many aspects of Judaism.

The Month of Elul TESHUVA IS THE ANSWER
The month of Elul serves as a vital time for self-reflection and personal accountability to prepare for true repentance.

P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: Realtor’s Fee on Large Commercial Building – part I
(based on ruling 85031 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
(based on ruling 85031 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)

P'ninat Mishpat Complaints about Contractor’s Work – part II
(based on ruling 83037.1 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
(based on ruling 83037.1 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)

Chemdat Yamim Moreshet Shaul: The Goal of an Agricultural Yeshiva – part I
Based on Siach Shaul, Pirkei Machshava V’Hadracha p. 263 (address at the laying of the cornerstone of the Yeshiva Chakla’it in Kfar Haroeh)
Based on Siach Shaul, Pirkei Machshava V’Hadracha p. 263 (address at the laying of the cornerstone of the Yeshiva Chakla’it in Kfar Haroeh)

Chemdat Yamim The Goal of an Agricultural Yeshiva – part II
Based on Siach Shaul, Pirkei Machshava V’Hadracha p. 263 (address at the cornerstone laying for the Yeshiva Chakla’it in Kfar Haroeh – 1938)
Based on Siach Shaul, Pirkei Machshava V’Hadracha p. 263 (address at the cornerstone laying for the Yeshiva Chakla’it in Kfar Haroeh – 1938)

Re'e NEVER EXTREME EXCEPT ISRAEL
Parshat Re'eh
Judaism is against extremism, so how can we understand the seemingly extreme statements found in our sages in favor of living in the Land of Israel and against living in Chutz laAretz? The article deals with the seeming contradiction between the strength of Free-Will and the strength of being influenced by our surroundings.

Ekev DANCE FOR ISRAEL- FOR YOUR BENEFIT
Parshat Eikev
Description: The 7 Haftarot we read after Tisha B'Av ("Shiva D'Nichemta") surely get us excited that they're coming TRUE, and awaken us to yearn, dance & join the return to Zion! The short article also deals with the problems and solutions facing the American Jewish community as discussed at a recent panel, as well as the question why Jews come from America to Israel to help when we face problems, but Israelis don't come to aid Jews in America when they face anti-Semitism.











