Yeshiva
Beit Midrash
- Sections
- Chemdat Yamim
- P'ninat Mishpat
Ruling: Beit din rejects def’s claim that pl deserves less than she was promised because of insufficient work, largely due to his own contradictions. This claim was a relatively late one; previously, def had said that if not for pl’s husband, pl and def would have continued working harmoniously. He also attributed the equal reduction in the two’s salary to insufficient finances.
P'ninat Mishpat (835)
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit
709 - Compensation for Transfer of Business to One Partner – part IV
710 - Compensation for Transfer of Business to One Partner – part VI
711 - Compensation for Transfer of Business to One Partner – part VII
Load More
According to dayan 1, once pl started complaining about her salary and asked for a raise as the clientele grew, it is logical that she deserved full pay envisioned. Although pl did not work as a therapist as many hours as envisioned, her many responsibilities could have compensated and justified full pay. Therefore, based on compromise, pl should be compensated with 10,000 NIS. Dayan 2 posited that mechila applied the whole time, since she continued working, fully aware of her pay. Dayan 2 agreed to award her 10,000 NIS due to the possibility that she received under the minimum wage, which by law is a right one cannot waive.
All the dayanim agreed that def should not get back pay for the time he received no salary. If mechila can apply to lower salary, it can apply to no salary. As owner of the entire business (including the other branch) into which the income was flowing, if he wanted to make this additional income payable later, he should have stated so, and to the contrary, he made a point of telling pl that he was not getting paid
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit
Igrot Hare’aya Connecting Disciplines in Torah Study
Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook 103 – part III
P'ninat Mishpat Limits of Interest Rate for Loan with Heter Iska – part I
based on ruling 80033 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
Igrot Hare’aya Trying to Arrange Purchase of Land in Eretz Yisrael
#222 Date and Place: 2 Elul 5669 (1909), Rechovot
Igrot Hare’aya Departure of an Uncle to Eretz Yisrael
Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook: Vol. I, #1 , p. 1-2 – part II
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: Undoing a Problematic Partnership – part III
based on ruling 84061 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: Complaints about Contractor’s Work – part II
(based on ruling 83037.1 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: Unsuccessful Transfer of Yeshiva – part V
based on appeal ruling 82138 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
Rabbis in Midrash
Lessons
fast navigation
Various Events FOR WHOM NOT TO VOTE
Rav Zvi Yehuda Kook stressed that Israeli politics is G-dly, so I have no problem answering this common question on a Torani blog. Also, Free-Will is a G-d-given right and obligation, to "destine one's fate" (R. Soloveichik, Kol Dodi Dofek, 67), so I obviously don't tell others how to vote. But once not a few (especially young) have already asked, a couple of personal words from experience and thoughts from chazal & Rav Kook which may be of help to others, mainly for whom NOT to vote.
P'ninat Mishpat Fallout from Failure to Install Elevator – part II
based on ruling 85007 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
