YeshivaThe torah world Gateway
Beit Midrash
- Torah Portion and Tanach
- Bereshit
- Vayishlach
Translated by Hillel Fendel
Some people ask if it is permitted to endanger oneself for the sake of the honor of the People of Israel. It seems from this week's Torah portion that the answer is yes.
The Torah recounts that a wicked man named Shechem ben Hamor took and defiled Yaakov Avinu's daughter Dina, causing irreparable harm to her and her family. The response of Dina's brothers Shimon and Levy was seemingly disproportionate: They killed Shechem and his townspeople. [The topic of this column is not the morality of this response, though we will relate to it incidentally as well. Rather,] we can conclude from this that it was permitted – and perhaps obligatory – for them to endanger themselves and their family over a matter of honor. Let us explain.
Yaakov's response to Shimon and Levy was not an approving one: "You have brought trouble upon me, bringing hatred/a bad reputation upon me in the eyes of the Canaanite and Prizite inhabitants here; I am few in number and they can gather against me and destroy my entire family" (B'reshit 34,30).
The brothers' defense was simply this: "Should he have been allowed to treat our sister as a prostitute?" That is, "Can we possibly agree to the defilement of the honor of a daughter of Israel, even if it brings danger upon us?"
It is interesting, and worthwhile, to see the Holy Ohr HaChaim's explanation to this story. He asks: How does the response of Shimon and Levy address Yaakov's concern?
The Or HaChaim explains that they meant the following: "If we had fallen upon and attacked the town with no pretext, you would be right, our actions would have been quite dangerous for our family, for the peoples would unite against us in war. But we definitely had a reason for what we did, and they see that we were justified; on the contrary, had we not responded as we did to this terrible provocation by Shechem, they would have all thought that we are weak and vulnerable – and that itself would have caused them to attack us. What we did was precisely the safest thing for us to do, so that they will fear us and leave us in peace!"
In this connection, I would like to recount what happened after the Yom Kippur War, when I brought the IDF Commander of the division in which I served to visit my rabbi, Rav Tzvi Yehuda HaCohen Kook of saintly blessed memory. This officer was the highest-ranking officer to be captured by the Egyptians during the war. He asked Rav Tzvi Yehuda, "Is the national honor of Israel something that an officer must fight to the end for, and not allow himself to be taken prisoner? Or, if he sees that there is no chance, may he, or must he, not allow himself to be killed for no purpose?" Rav Tzvi Yehuda answered simply: "Nu, King Sha'ul."
He was referring to the first King of Israel who did not want to be taken captive, and asked his aides to kill him so that he would not fall into enemy captivity.
Later, the Rav related that during murderous Arab pogroms in various places in the Land of Israel during the period of the British Mandate, the British army did not protect the Jews. Some people came to Rav Kook - Rav Tzvi Yehuda's father and Chief Rabbi of the Land at the time - and asked him to go to the British High Commissioner and ask/demand that the British act resolutely to prevent the riots. Rav Kook sent his son Rav Tzvi Yehuda and another man to update the National Council, which was akin to the Jewish government in the Land at the time.
But when Mr. Usishkin – head of the Jewish National Fund – heard this, he firmly stood and demanded that Rav Kook not go to "beg" the High Commissioner for anything. "This is not in keeping with the Rav's honor, nor with the Jewish People's honor," he said. "Even if danger is involved, we cannot debase Israel's honor."
The way Rav Tzvi Yehuda told this, it was understood that he identified with what Usishkin said. The honor of Israel is not a private matter, and no individual, nor even a sector, is permitted to forego it.
Some people ask if it is permitted to endanger oneself for the sake of the honor of the People of Israel. It seems from this week's Torah portion that the answer is yes.
The Torah recounts that a wicked man named Shechem ben Hamor took and defiled Yaakov Avinu's daughter Dina, causing irreparable harm to her and her family. The response of Dina's brothers Shimon and Levy was seemingly disproportionate: They killed Shechem and his townspeople. [The topic of this column is not the morality of this response, though we will relate to it incidentally as well. Rather,] we can conclude from this that it was permitted – and perhaps obligatory – for them to endanger themselves and their family over a matter of honor. Let us explain.
Yaakov's response to Shimon and Levy was not an approving one: "You have brought trouble upon me, bringing hatred/a bad reputation upon me in the eyes of the Canaanite and Prizite inhabitants here; I am few in number and they can gather against me and destroy my entire family" (B'reshit 34,30).
The brothers' defense was simply this: "Should he have been allowed to treat our sister as a prostitute?" That is, "Can we possibly agree to the defilement of the honor of a daughter of Israel, even if it brings danger upon us?"
It is interesting, and worthwhile, to see the Holy Ohr HaChaim's explanation to this story. He asks: How does the response of Shimon and Levy address Yaakov's concern?
The Or HaChaim explains that they meant the following: "If we had fallen upon and attacked the town with no pretext, you would be right, our actions would have been quite dangerous for our family, for the peoples would unite against us in war. But we definitely had a reason for what we did, and they see that we were justified; on the contrary, had we not responded as we did to this terrible provocation by Shechem, they would have all thought that we are weak and vulnerable – and that itself would have caused them to attack us. What we did was precisely the safest thing for us to do, so that they will fear us and leave us in peace!"
In this connection, I would like to recount what happened after the Yom Kippur War, when I brought the IDF Commander of the division in which I served to visit my rabbi, Rav Tzvi Yehuda HaCohen Kook of saintly blessed memory. This officer was the highest-ranking officer to be captured by the Egyptians during the war. He asked Rav Tzvi Yehuda, "Is the national honor of Israel something that an officer must fight to the end for, and not allow himself to be taken prisoner? Or, if he sees that there is no chance, may he, or must he, not allow himself to be killed for no purpose?" Rav Tzvi Yehuda answered simply: "Nu, King Sha'ul."
He was referring to the first King of Israel who did not want to be taken captive, and asked his aides to kill him so that he would not fall into enemy captivity.
Later, the Rav related that during murderous Arab pogroms in various places in the Land of Israel during the period of the British Mandate, the British army did not protect the Jews. Some people came to Rav Kook - Rav Tzvi Yehuda's father and Chief Rabbi of the Land at the time - and asked him to go to the British High Commissioner and ask/demand that the British act resolutely to prevent the riots. Rav Kook sent his son Rav Tzvi Yehuda and another man to update the National Council, which was akin to the Jewish government in the Land at the time.
But when Mr. Usishkin – head of the Jewish National Fund – heard this, he firmly stood and demanded that Rav Kook not go to "beg" the High Commissioner for anything. "This is not in keeping with the Rav's honor, nor with the Jewish People's honor," he said. "Even if danger is involved, we cannot debase Israel's honor."
The way Rav Tzvi Yehuda told this, it was understood that he identified with what Usishkin said. The honor of Israel is not a private matter, and no individual, nor even a sector, is permitted to forego it.
Rabbis in Midrash
Lessons
fast navigation
Kuzari -Rabbi Ari Shvat Kuzari class 9 - "Seeing is Believing" (parag. 21-30)
These paragraphs elaborate on the theme that seeing and knowing is better than any attempt to prove logically, and begins explaining the difference between Israel and gentiles.
Ein Aya Various Universal Stages of the Geula Process
Rav Kook examines the various stages of redemption, explaining how (in addition to the obvious oft-mentioned stages of ingathering the exiles, reviving the Hebrew language, army, state etc.) the messianic dream of world prosperity, the State of Israel and world unity can and are realistically and logically gradually coming true.
Kuzari -Rabbi Ari Shvat Kuzari class 8- "Answering Questions on the Kuzari's Proof from Mass Revelation
How do we know that the "claim" of mass revelation to 2,000,000 witnesses at Mt. Sinai is really true? This important class answers all of the questions skeptics ask about this claim of the Kuzari.
Ein Aya Armies Still Necessary for Balance & the War Against Wars
Rav Kook explains why the world was originally divided into the various seemingly contradicting ideologies and cultures, in order to develop each one respectively. Swords or armies symbolize how each respective ideology defends themselves, as well as deters their opposing ideologies and cultures. On the other hand, the messianic era will be one of peace, and Rav Kook explains the transition to that stage, which mankind is already undergoing.
The Land of Israel LGBT'S IN ISRAEL
The question was asked, how can one make Aliyah with the LGBT parades?
Kuzari -Rabbi Ari Shvat Kuzari class 7 - Five Accumulative Proofs of G-d
As a preparation for the Kuzari's classic proof of G-d from the mass-revelation at Sinai, we start here with 5 other directions to strengthen our belief which also contribute to what the Kuzari will present as well.
Ein Aya Muscle & Meaning: The Dual Nature of Gevurah (Physical Strength)
Is physical strength and fitness a necessity or an ideal? Although it if often totally overlooked among topics of Judaism, Rav Kook writes that it clearly is also a necessity to deter the many enemies of Israel, but even in Y'mot HaMashiach, in the Messianic era, to a certain extent, it's ideal continues even after our enemies will have been finished off.
