YeshivaThe torah world Gateway
Beit Midrash
- Sections
- Chemdat Yamim
- Bemare Habazak - Rabbis Questions
Answer: A mishna (Shekalim 2:5) says that if money is raised to support a poor person or ransom a captive, any leftover money after the needs were taken care of goes to the person for whom the money was raised. There are multiple opinions of what to do with money remaining from what was raised for a funeral – to the inheritors; left untouched; to create a commemoration. The Yerushalmi (ad loc.) brings a machloket regarding money that was raised but turned out was not needed.
Among Rishonim, the Beit Yosef (Yoreh Deah 253) cites a machloket between the Rashba and Rosh regarding unspent money of pidyon shvuyim. The Rashba (Shut IV:55) says that if money was raised to ransom someone and he died before being ransomed, the money goes to his inheritors, based on the mishna above. The Rosh (Shut 32:6) addresses a case where the kidnapped woman decided not to return to the Jewish community. He ruled that since the donors did not intend to donate money for such an occurrence, the money should return to them. He distinguishes between his case and the mishna – the mishna is when the money was primarily used as planned, in which case, donors do not seek any returns. In contrast, if the money turns out to not be needed, it is returned. The Shulchan Aruch (YD 253:7) cites both opinions, but prefers the Rosh. The Rama (ad loc.) and other poskim (see Shut Chatam Sofer II:237) also accept the Rosh.
Therefore, the general answer to your question is that if the need disappeared, the money should be returned to the donors. However, cases can differ from each other. The Chevel Nachalato ((Epstein) II:37) refers to a case where the fundraising campaign focused on the dire financial situation of the family of the sick woman, so that there was logic to want the money to go to the family when she died pre-surgery. He justifies this due to a weaker assumption that people would want their money and also due to authority of tzedaka collectors, as we now explain. A public charity organization has the right to make decisions to change the intended recipient from that which the donors were informed of (Shulchan Aruch, YD 256:4). Therefore, Rav Epstein encouraged the charity fund to change the funds from medical to helping the impoverished family.
It is not clear if you are fundraising independently for the family or funneling funds to and through an NPO. The latter has some technical and halachic advantages. First of all, donors who pass the tax threshold benefit from significant tax breaks through a qualified NPO. It also shields you from questions that could arise about how you handled the money. On the halachic end, we have seen that public charity gabbaim have the authority to make decisions what to do with funds in cases like you raise. If someone specifically does not want that but wants the money back if the need changes, he could indeed use you with an explicit stipulation, which would work. On the other hand, some organizations (one should not generalize) take a percentage of the contributions earmarked for a person to cover overhead (which is legitimate), so raising and giving the money directly to the person in need can sometimes help him.
If you act independently, you should document the sources of the money carefully, for several reasons. The Rosh (above), while fundamentally advocating return to the donors in cases like these, acknowledges that this is not always feasible, and suggests using the money for a project helping the masses or for a need of the same type. If you have already passed the money on, you have no responsibility to try to get it back. However, if you document at least sizable donations that are still in your control, you would owe to the people who trusted you to ask them what to do with the money that became unused for its intended purpose.
Bemare Habazak - Rabbis Questions (654)
Rabbi Daniel Mann
661 - Ask the Rabbi: Giving Away Offensively Left Materials
662 - Ask the Rabbi: Collecting Money for a Specific Medical Cause
663 - Ask the Rabbi: The Power of Rabbis in Berachot
Load More
Rabbis in Midrash
Lessons
fast navigation
Kuzari -Rabbi Ari Shvat Kuzari class 9 - "Seeing is Believing" (parag. 21-30)
These paragraphs elaborate on the theme that seeing and knowing is better than any attempt to prove logically, and begins explaining the difference between Israel and gentiles.
Ein Aya Various Universal Stages of the Geula Process
Rav Kook examines the various stages of redemption, explaining how (in addition to the obvious oft-mentioned stages of ingathering the exiles, reviving the Hebrew language, army, state etc.) the messianic dream of world prosperity, the State of Israel and world unity can and are realistically and logically gradually coming true.
Kuzari -Rabbi Ari Shvat Kuzari class 8- "Answering Questions on the Kuzari's Proof from Mass Revelation
How do we know that the "claim" of mass revelation to 2,000,000 witnesses at Mt. Sinai is really true? This important class answers all of the questions skeptics ask about this claim of the Kuzari.
Ein Aya Armies Still Necessary for Balance & the War Against Wars
Rav Kook explains why the world was originally divided into the various seemingly contradicting ideologies and cultures, in order to develop each one respectively. Swords or armies symbolize how each respective ideology defends themselves, as well as deters their opposing ideologies and cultures. On the other hand, the messianic era will be one of peace, and Rav Kook explains the transition to that stage, which mankind is already undergoing.
The Land of Israel LGBT'S IN ISRAEL
The question was asked, how can one make Aliyah with the LGBT parades?
Kuzari -Rabbi Ari Shvat Kuzari class 7 - Five Accumulative Proofs of G-d
As a preparation for the Kuzari's classic proof of G-d from the mass-revelation at Sinai, we start here with 5 other directions to strengthen our belief which also contribute to what the Kuzari will present as well.
Ein Aya Muscle & Meaning: The Dual Nature of Gevurah (Physical Strength)
Is physical strength and fitness a necessity or an ideal? Although it if often totally overlooked among topics of Judaism, Rav Kook writes that it clearly is also a necessity to deter the many enemies of Israel, but even in Y'mot HaMashiach, in the Messianic era, to a certain extent, it's ideal continues even after our enemies will have been finished off.
