YeshivaThe torah world Gateway
Beit Midrash
- Sections
- Chemdat Yamim
- P'ninat Mishpat
Case: The plaintiffs (=pl) bought an apartment from the defendants (=def) in August. After the first autumn rains, pl noticed dampness in the walls in three locations in the apartment. They had the apartment fixed at a cost of 1,500 shekels and estimate the cost of time taken off from work to find and supervise a contractor at another 1,100 shekels. All agree that pl asked about the existence of dampness before buying. Def claim that they informed pl about two areas of dampness; pl deny this. Def also claim that if pl are being so exacting, they want to offset any award with compensation for pl’s significant lateness in two purchase payments.
Ruling: While there is a dispute whether def disclosed information on dampness, this is not critical to arrive at a ruling for the following reason.
P'ninat Mishpat (832)
Various Rabbis
433 - Connection between a Leak and a Broken Washing Machine
434 - Dampness
435 - Kashrut of a Tea Bag Holder
Load More
The sides dispute the application of these principles. Def claim that pl knew or should have known about the dampness, whereas pl claim that dampness in walls is a hidden blemish, in regard to which they did not relinquish rights. On this point, we agree with pl.
However, the contract does not address what the consequence of dampness is. One can claim that dampness is too small/common a blemish to be subject to steps against the seller. On the other hand, all agree that pl asked def whether there was dampness, which shows that it was important to them. We also reject def’s claim that one has to expect dampness in a 14 year-old building.
Halacha does not accept the approach of "let the buyer beware," as a buyer who was deceived can void the sale (see Shach, CM 227:14). On the other hand, when there is a blemish which is detectable and the buyer does not bother to check, there is a machloket whether he can complain about it (see Pitchei Teshuva, CM 232:1). The Shulchan Aruch (Choshen Mishpat 232:7) says that one cannot relinquish claims of blemishes in a sales item unless the blemish is known and specified. Two of the spots had peeled paint, which is a strong indication of dampness. In such cases, the Rashba (Shut I:1127) treats it like the relinquishing of rights to a known blemish. This is strengthened by the clause that states that pl checked the apartment with an architect, lawyer, and engineer, the latter of whom would certainly have found it.
One of the spots of dampness would have been hard to find. However, def claim that dampness at this spot did not exist before the sale. It is difficult to make a determination on such a matter. Therefore, we cannot extract payment from def. This makes the question of offsetting for late payment moot. But on a moral level, we note that it is strange for pl to be so exacting on a relatively small and common problem with the apartment such as minor dampness, while they were lax regarding something as basic as keeping to the payment schedule.
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: Undoing a Problematic Partnership – part II
based on ruling 84061 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: To Whom Do the Payments Go? – part I
based on ruling 81075 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: Agricultural Water Rights – part I
based on ruling 84122 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: Dividing Parents’ Resources when Mother Still Alive
based on ruling 82017 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
Rabbis in Midrash
Lessons
fast navigation
Shoftim TESHUVA IN COURT OF LAW?
Parshat Shoftim-Chodesh Elul
Why does parshat Shoftim always come out during Elul? This innovative and central explanation is an eye-opener regarding many aspects of Judaism.
The Month of Elul TESHUVA IS THE ANSWER
The month of Elul serves as a vital time for self-reflection and personal accountability to prepare for true repentance.
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: Realtor’s Fee on Large Commercial Building – part I
(based on ruling 85031 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
(based on ruling 85031 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
P'ninat Mishpat Complaints about Contractor’s Work – part II
(based on ruling 83037.1 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
(based on ruling 83037.1 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
Chemdat Yamim Moreshet Shaul: The Goal of an Agricultural Yeshiva – part I
Based on Siach Shaul, Pirkei Machshava V’Hadracha p. 263 (address at the laying of the cornerstone of the Yeshiva Chakla’it in Kfar Haroeh)
Based on Siach Shaul, Pirkei Machshava V’Hadracha p. 263 (address at the laying of the cornerstone of the Yeshiva Chakla’it in Kfar Haroeh)
Chemdat Yamim The Goal of an Agricultural Yeshiva – part II
Based on Siach Shaul, Pirkei Machshava V’Hadracha p. 263 (address at the cornerstone laying for the Yeshiva Chakla’it in Kfar Haroeh – 1938)
Based on Siach Shaul, Pirkei Machshava V’Hadracha p. 263 (address at the cornerstone laying for the Yeshiva Chakla’it in Kfar Haroeh – 1938)
Re'e NEVER EXTREME EXCEPT ISRAEL
Parshat Re'eh
Judaism is against extremism, so how can we understand the seemingly extreme statements found in our sages in favor of living in the Land of Israel and against living in Chutz laAretz? The article deals with the seeming contradiction between the strength of Free-Will and the strength of being influenced by our surroundings.
Ekev DANCE FOR ISRAEL- FOR YOUR BENEFIT
Parshat Eikev
Description: The 7 Haftarot we read after Tisha B'Av ("Shiva D'Nichemta") surely get us excited that they're coming TRUE, and awaken us to yearn, dance & join the return to Zion! The short article also deals with the problems and solutions facing the American Jewish community as discussed at a recent panel, as well as the question why Jews come from America to Israel to help when we face problems, but Israelis don't come to aid Jews in America when they face anti-Semitism.
