YeshivaThe torah world Gateway
Beit Midrash
- Sections
- Chemdat Yamim
- Moreshet Shaul
Regarding the Rambam and Rihal (R. Yehuda Halevi), you claimed at length that Maskilim were overly dependent on their opinions. You should realize, though, that not everything that was "touched" by the Maskilim became unfit for use because they touched it. The main question is what conclusions one draws from it. I don’t think that someone who reads what I wrote will take on an outlook of rationalism. It is worthwhile to know that there are differences between the Rambam and Rihal, and that Rihal criticizes that which he calls "the god of Aristotle," whereas the Rambam saw in him brilliant approaches. It is important to stress this and learn it in great depth. It is also clear that the way Rihal views the concept of loving Hashem is very different from that of the Rambam. It is neither critical nor even worthwhile to blur the differences between their conceptions.
The difference in the grasp of the concept of Israel is also undeniable. The Rambam (Commentary on the Mishna) assumes fundamentally that for a person to be a complete person, he must grasp things intellectually. This connects to the Rambam’s distinction between mitzvot of contemplation and mitzvot of actions and his position that if one serves Hashem without proper thought, it is as if he worships a different god. Considering this, when the Rambam stresses that whoever is not convinced there is prophecy in the world is one whose fathers did not stand on Sinai or that Hashem will not break His covenant are only things he said to deal with times of [religious] danger. This is because the Rambam posits that a person’s service of Hashem is in his intellectual side and not in the attributes he inherited from his forebears.
In contrast, Rihal continuously talks about the innate uniqueness of Israel, which comes to them as an "inheritance from their forebears," and that this is the main thing, in contrast to intellectual achievement, which is of secondary significance. Obviously, there are differences, and I just noted that we pointed out the disagreements without deciding which opinion is to be accepted.
I wrote that the need for laborers, soldiers, and great scientists is positive, and you deduced from this that "there is no problem whatsoever for a person to not dedicate himself to Torah study." By adding on to what I said, you caused a distortion. I only said that the world is built on dividing tasks between different people, and since Hashem built on this assumption, the situation is a preferred one. Clearly, all the professions that enable people to be steeped in Torah study are critical for the world, and the fact that people enter such professions, is according to the divine plan for the world’s development. This is what the Rambam says on the question as to why the world has people who cannot reach intellectual achievement. The answer is that they are needed to provide things for those who are capable of the achievement. In other words, we are to view the world as one in which people are acting according to the set plan.
Therefore, there is no contradiction between the matter of the world and the question of the individual. It is better to be the unique intellectually achieving person than to be one of the many who are made to provide for him. Yet, for each of the people there is a positive purpose. The main difference is whether we look at simple laborers as those who are damaging the world (see Shabbat 33b) or people who deserve mutual respect (see Berachot 17a). Should Torah scholars stay secluded, concerned about themselves, and look down on others in a disapproving and haughty way? Or, should the scholars see themselves as responsible for the whole community and appreciate those who are helping provide for them. This is what I meant.
Moreshet Shaul (44)
Various Rabbis
27 - Moreshet Shaul: Eretz Yisrael in Halacha and in Sanctity – part I
28 - Moreshet Shaul: Eretz Yisrael in Halacha and in Sanctity – part II
29 - Moreshet Shaul: Returning Torah to its Central Standing – part I
Load More
Moreshet Shaul Moreshet Shaul: What Connects Us as a Nation – part I
Based on Siach Shaul, Pirkei Machshava V’Hadracha p. 704
Moreshet Shaul Moreshet Shaul: Character Refinement – part II
Based on Siach Shaul, Pirkei Machshava V’Hadracha p.154
Rabbis in Midrash
Lessons
fast navigation
Kuzari -Rabbi Ari Shvat Kuzari class 5- "Proofs of G-d"
This may be the most important class of the entire book, where we finally get to the Jewish proof of the existence of G-d and truth of the Torah. We should follow His own direction where He tells us how to get to Him: through the Nation of Israel: Jewish history, Jewish prophets (and today, prophecies fulfilled), and national reward & punishment towards Am Yisrael.
Ein Aya One Humanity, One Creator, One Jerusalem
Rav Kook innovatively and beautifully explains this aggadeta where our sages say that after Jerusalem was destroyed her cinnamon fragrance is only found locked in a particular kingdom's treasury.
Shlach Lecha "Why So Many Don't Make Aliya?" - Parshat Shlach
This short article deals with the weird phenomena that every single time Am Yisrael is meant to enter the Land of Israel, throughout the Tanach, 2nd Temple and until today, they "chicken out" and look for excuses. What's the problem with this mitzvah that proves so challenging. The article, based on sources, suggests that the difficulties of Eretz Yisrael is precisely her secret and beauty!
Kuzari -Rabbi Ari Shvat Kuzari class 4
The class deals with Islam and how the Muslim tries convincing the King of the Khazars, and why he was also rejected.
Beha'alotcha JEWISH STATE= GUIDE TO G-DLINESS & SELFLESSNESS
A Jewish State not only is a good idea, but educates us towards selflessness, altruism and G-dliness in our daily lives.
Ein Aya In Zion Even the Smoke of the Bark is Sweet
Just as Jewish nationalism is different from others, so too our capitol of Jerusalem is totally different than other national capitols. Rav Kook beautifully explains the passage in the Talmud that the trees of Yerushalayim were cinnamon trees.
Kuzari -Rabbi Ari Shvat Kuzari class 3
The second speaker invited to convince the Khazar King is the Christian, who presents their beliefs. Even before the questions of the King, "between the lines", the author R. Yehuda HaLevi already begins disproving them.
Ein Aya "Intimacy: Love, Life & Giving or Egocentric Taking & Expiration"
Today, many confuse between intimacy in marriage, based on love, giving and life which are diametrically opposed to empty "sex", pornography and prostitution which destroyed the Beit HaMikdash. The practical importance of clarifying this topic in today's western society is obvious, especially for young adults.