My dream is to help develop Noahide theology, and within that, to pioneer a kind of systematic theology for Noahides. What do you think about that? The reason I started thinking this way is because systematic theology is traditionally a Christian theological model. However, the function and synergy of systematic theology can be incredibly powerful when applied to the Noahide context — since Noahides are Bnei Noach (descendants of Noah), non-Jews, and they are bound by the Noahide laws. These laws require serious study, and in that sense, the Noahide framework differs from — but can also be compared to — Islamic jurisprudence (Shariah and Fiqh). Noahides must study and understand the Seven Laws of Noah deeply, and to both spread and defend the Noahide path, a coherent theological framework is essential. That’s where I think systematic theology can be applied. In Christian theology, systematic theology is an approach that organizes and articulates the core doctrines of the faith in a logical, structured manner. It includes technical terms, structured topics, and the notion of theology as a puzzle — where doctrines are carefully fit together in a coherent whole. In systematic theology, “doctrine” refers to statements that carry authority — either private interpretations or public declarations that have been affirmed by the Church and aligned with its faith. One example is the concept of revelation in systematic theology. It includes: Active revelation: God’s act of disclosing truths about Himself and His will through actions. Passive revelation: The outcome or product of God’s revelatory actions. Systematic theology doesn’t treat revelation as merely passive but rather as intentional, voluntary, and purposeful divine communication. Revelation is typically divided into: Special revelation: Direct, specific communication such as theophanies (appearances of God), prophecy (God’s will communicated), and miracles (God revealing His nature). General revelation: Indirect, universal knowledge of God through nature, conscience, and history — accessible to all people. When all of these are brought together and fully articulated, they lead to scripture as recorded revelation — the ultimate norm for Christian life and faith. That’s why Christianity is called a religion of revelation. Now, if we were to build something similar for the Noahide path — assembling and analyzing doctrines, defending them against critiques, and organizing them into a logical theological structure — we could answer complex questions and challenges in a compelling way. It would also allow us to show how the Seven Noahide Laws can be applied and interpreted systematically. Moreover, this structure would enable us to compare and interact with Islamic Fiqh or other theological systems on equal intellectual footing. One of the great strengths of systematic theology is that it equips its students — even those coming from science or comparative religion — with sharp analytical and logical tools. It becomes a kind of intellectual armor, capable of both explaining and defending the faith. What do you think?

Sounds great! I strongly suggest contacting the Noahide World Center and Rabbi Dr. Amnon Hever, or Rabbi Ouri Cherki of Brit Shalom who deal extensively with Noahides much more than I, and especially R. Cherki who is an outstanding philosopher who may already be familiar with such attempts which have already begun. All the best!!