YeshivaThe torah world Gateway
Beit Midrash
- Sections
- Chemdat Yamim
- P'ninat Mishpat
Case: The plaintiff (=pl) bought "on paper" an apartment in a yishuv from a contractor (=def). The contract spelled out payment and construction schedules, at the end of which pl was supposed to receive ownership. (In Yehuda and Shomron, the equivalent to ownership is called bar reshut, and it represents practical control under the auspices of a department of the Jewish Agency.) Toward the end of the building, pl was supposed to make the last payment (with the use of several post-dated checks), but they have refused to do so with the claim of problems with def’s work. Def now wants to cancel the sale due to lack of payment and with the claim that pl’s father’s tyrannical behavior has caused delays and infighting with other members of the building project. Pl refuses to cancel the purchase and says that def wants it because prices have since gone up.
Ruling: The nature of the relationship between pl and def is that def is a contracted worker, not just a seller of a future apartment. Pl cannot back out of the relationship because the building is being built for several families, and firing def would affect the rights of the others. Although usually a contracted worker can back out of the relationship, the Rama (Choshen Mishpat 333:1) rules that if the sides made a kinyan, the contracted worker cannot back out. The Pitchei Teshuva (ad loc. 2) says that a work contract is considered a kinyan in this regard.
Although pl had been late in payment in the past, since def did not ask to void their contract at the time, it is too late to cancel due to those violations. Regarding the present late payment, beit din appointed an expert to check the apartment, and he determined that it is not fit for occupancy (which is a condition for the last payment). Among other problems, there are dangers from incomplete electrical lines. Def wants to disqualify the expert with the claim that he has a relationship with pl. However, the expert reports that he has the mildest of acquaintances with pl, and since in other elements of the testimony, def wanted to rely on his report, beit din does not accept, at this point, that his objection is in good faith. Therefore, the present payment is not late, and it is then obviously not grounds to void the agreement.
Regarding the behavior of pl and his father, def did not bring any credible evidence that there was anything that would justify such unusual grounds to justify voiding a sale. The behavior cited that the representative of beit din saw during the visit to the building site was not atypical of the acrimony that often exists between litigants.
Therefore, def should continue construction until fit for occupancy. This stage should be confirmed by the expert. At that point, pl should give def the postdated checks according to the schedule found in their contract.
P'ninat Mishpat (832)
Various Rabbis
451 - Who Is Responsible for Municipal Tax When? – part II
452 - Was Work Properly Done?
453 - New Buildings Blocking View – part I
Load More
Various Rabbis
Various Rabbis including those of of Yeshivat Bet El, such as Rabbi Chaim Katz, Rabbi Binyamin Bamberger and Rabbi Yitzchak Greenblat and others.
Moreshet Shaul Moreshet Shaul: A Crown and its Scepter – part II
Based on Siach Shaul, Pirkei Machshava V’Hadracha p. 294-5
P'ninat Mishpat P'NINAT MISHPAT: A Mess of Loans, Repayments and Grievances – part II
based on ruling 83033 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: A Contractor’s Leaving the Job in the Middle – part I
based on ruling 84013 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
Rabbis in Midrash
Lessons
fast navigation
Shoftim TESHUVA IN COURT OF LAW?
Parshat Shoftim-Chodesh Elul
Why does parshat Shoftim always come out during Elul? This innovative and central explanation is an eye-opener regarding many aspects of Judaism.
The Month of Elul TESHUVA IS THE ANSWER
The month of Elul serves as a vital time for self-reflection and personal accountability to prepare for true repentance.
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: Realtor’s Fee on Large Commercial Building – part I
(based on ruling 85031 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
(based on ruling 85031 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
P'ninat Mishpat Complaints about Contractor’s Work – part II
(based on ruling 83037.1 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
(based on ruling 83037.1 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
Chemdat Yamim Moreshet Shaul: The Goal of an Agricultural Yeshiva – part I
Based on Siach Shaul, Pirkei Machshava V’Hadracha p. 263 (address at the laying of the cornerstone of the Yeshiva Chakla’it in Kfar Haroeh)
Based on Siach Shaul, Pirkei Machshava V’Hadracha p. 263 (address at the laying of the cornerstone of the Yeshiva Chakla’it in Kfar Haroeh)
Chemdat Yamim The Goal of an Agricultural Yeshiva – part II
Based on Siach Shaul, Pirkei Machshava V’Hadracha p. 263 (address at the cornerstone laying for the Yeshiva Chakla’it in Kfar Haroeh – 1938)
Based on Siach Shaul, Pirkei Machshava V’Hadracha p. 263 (address at the cornerstone laying for the Yeshiva Chakla’it in Kfar Haroeh – 1938)
Re'e NEVER EXTREME EXCEPT ISRAEL
Parshat Re'eh
Judaism is against extremism, so how can we understand the seemingly extreme statements found in our sages in favor of living in the Land of Israel and against living in Chutz laAretz? The article deals with the seeming contradiction between the strength of Free-Will and the strength of being influenced by our surroundings.
Ekev DANCE FOR ISRAEL- FOR YOUR BENEFIT
Parshat Eikev
Description: The 7 Haftarot we read after Tisha B'Av ("Shiva D'Nichemta") surely get us excited that they're coming TRUE, and awaken us to yearn, dance & join the return to Zion! The short article also deals with the problems and solutions facing the American Jewish community as discussed at a recent panel, as well as the question why Jews come from America to Israel to help when we face problems, but Israelis don't come to aid Jews in America when they face anti-Semitism.
