YeshivaThe torah world Gateway
Beit Midrash
- Sections
- Chemdat Yamim
- P'ninat Mishpat
Ruling: Pl claims that rc never sent maps limiting homes to a half a dunam. Beit din rejects this claim. Rc has a file for pl’s property, with much detailed documentation, including the maps in question. This file was not opened by itself. The indications that pl were aware of what was planned for them is corroborated by rc’s engineer’s (=rce) testimony. While there were some difficulties with rce’s testimony, it makes clear the basic fact that there was a discussion between rc and pl at the relevant times.
While rc lacks authority to allocate land without permission from those who control it, since it is part of rc’s responsibility to prepare not yet recognized settlements for normalization, that includes preventing anarchy in land allocation that prevents such normalization. As mentioned in the past, pl used rc’s influence to receive their lot in the first place.
Rc presented a clear stance to beit din that they were against anyone having a lot larger than 700 square meters. Pl claim that this is a change in their longstanding policy in regard to pl, and is based on political pressure. Beit din sees no change in rc’s policy, which was well known and finds expression in rc’s file on pl.
Rc claims that the area south of pl’s property was set aside as a public open space, and pl claim that it was agreed that they would have special rights to usage there. There was a meeting at which it was agreed that a rock retaining wall at the area’s boundary with pl’s property would be built by def, and be paid for by pl. Pl claim that at a meeting they were promised that anything above the rock formation would be for their full use, and rc’s representative to that meeting refused to come and testify what transpired. Pl claims that this proves that they are correct and the representative is intimidated by def. Beit din rejects that claim. One needs strong grounds to establish that one who refuses to testify does so because of a litigant’s intimidation (Shulchan Aruch, Choshen Mishpat 92:6). In this case, the representative is a powerful person who should not feel intimidated by def. Although rc had suggested a compromise regarding this area, this is not binding, as it just represents what rc could accept from a planning perspective. Regarding a public area, the people of the public (def) need to accept it. Joint usage of the area would have required cooperation between def and pl, which we see is untenable, due to the enmity between them.
P'ninat Mishpat (827)
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit
855 - P'NINAT MISHPAT: REGULATION OF LAND RIGHTS IN A SETTLEMENT EXTENSION – PART III
856 - Regulation of Land Rights in a Settlement Extension – part IV
Load More
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit
P'ninat Mishpat Limits of Interest Rate for Loan with Heter Iska – part I
based on ruling 80033 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
Igrot Hare’aya Semi-solicited Advice to Calm Down Petach Tikva
#227 Date and Place: 8 Tishrei 5669, Yafo
P'ninat Mishpat A Commercial Rental for a Closed Business – part II
based on ruling 80047 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
P'ninat Mishpat Profits from Formerly Joint Swimming Pool – part
(based on ruling 81110 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: How Many Dayanim?
based on ruling 84139-1 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: Problematic Lights?
based on appeal of ruling 84085 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
P'ninat Mishpat P'ninat Mishpat: Sharing in Plumbing Expenses – part I
based on ruling 85013 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
Rabbis in Midrash
Lessons
fast navigation
The Land of Israel LGBT'S IN ISRAEL
The question was asked, how can one make Aliyah with the LGBT parades?
Kuzari -Rabbi Ari Shvat Kuzari class 7 - Five Accumulative Proofs of G-d
As a preparation for the Kuzari's classic proof of G-d from the mass-revelation at Sinai, we start here with 5 other directions to strengthen our belief which also contribute to what the Kuzari will present as well.
Ein Aya Muscle & Meaning: The Dual Nature of Gevurah (Physical Strength)
Is physical strength and fitness a necessity or an ideal? Although it if often totally overlooked among topics of Judaism, Rav Kook writes that it clearly is also a necessity to deter the many enemies of Israel, but even in Y'mot HaMashiach, in the Messianic era, to a certain extent, it's ideal continues even after our enemies will have been finished off.
Ein Aya Armies Still Necessary for Balance & the War Against Wars
Rav Kook explains why the world was originally divided into the various seemingly contradicting ideologies and cultures, in order to develop each one respectively. Swords or armies symbolize how each respective ideology defends themselves, as well as deters their opposing ideologies and cultures. On the other hand, the messianic era will be one of peace, and Rav Kook explains the transition to that stage, which mankind is already undergoing.
Chukat "HOW ENTEBBE STOLE THE BICENTENNIAL
The Difference Between Historic & Eternal"
As we approach America's 250th birthday, it's worth remembering her 200th Bicentennial birthday, on Jul. 4th 1976, when Israel "stole the show" by shocking the world & miraculously saving 101 hostages in a foreign continent. As Pres. As Pres. Trump decides which countries get priority in his new Middle-East, it's worth reminding him of the difference between historic events and eternally historic ones. This obviously connects with this week's parsha, as well!
Kuzari -Rabbi Ari Shvat Kuzari class 6 - The Parable of the King of India
The advantages of testimony over circumstantial evidence or philosophical speculation.
