Beit Midrash

x
x
filter by media
filter by Lesson length
3 Lessons
    undefined
    P'ninat Mishpat

    P'ninat Mishpat: Firing a Contractor – part II

    Plaintiff 2 (=pl2) was the contractor for major renovations of the defendant’s (=def) home; plaintiff 1 (=pl1) was the supervisor. The contract stated that pl2 would finish the job in 120 work days within approximately six months. After over eight months, with the job not close to complete, def fired them, with the claim that pl2 was working only sporadically because he took on another job. Pl2 claims that he took the other job only after def fell behind in payments and that he had already worked 140 days because def made additions to the original plans. Pl2 claims that def fired them when she received a bill for the additional work. Def says that she wrote a letter to fire them before she received that bill, that she paid less than spelled out because she bought some of the materials that pl2 was required to, and because the work was behind schedule. She claims that pl1 approved the amount she paid and that pl2 did not protest.

    Various Rabbis | Sivan 10 5779
    undefined
    A Gate to the Din

    Attempt to Limit the Duration of a Rabbi’s Contract

    Various Rabbis | Sivan 29 5775
    undefined
    P'ninat Mishpat

    Bal Talin When Worker is Working for Himself

    Various Rabbis | 5775
את המידע הדפסתי באמצעות אתר yeshiva.org.il