Sign in | Register
 
 
 
Home Page Bet Midrash Torah Portion and Tanach Torah Portion Bamidbar Korach Bookmark and Share


Print
Send to a friend

5773

Aviram Lives on and Dies Again


From "Chemdat Yamim" Parsha Sheet
www.eretzhemdah.org



One of the main partners in the crime of Korach, in the attack on the leadership of Moshe, was Aviram (counterpart, actually brother, of Datan). Besides the Torah narrative, Aviram also receives mention in Tehillim (106:16-17): "They were jealous against Moshe in the encampment, about Aharon, Hashems holy one. The earth opened and swallowed Datan, and it covered up the congregation of (adat) Aviram." The term "adat Aviram" is interesting, in comparison to the more famous term from the Chumash, "adat Korach" (see Bamidbar 26:9; Bamidbar 27:3).
Let us return to the building of Yericho, which we discussed last week. Chiel rebuilt Yericho despite the curse of Yehoshua and paid a serious price: in the beginning of the process his elder son Aviram died, and his younger son Seguv died later, as Yehoshua had predestined (Melachim I 16:34). The next pasuk in the navi begins the story of a decree that Eliyahu made that there would be rain in Israel only when Eliyahu decreed it, which was followed by a long drought. The gemara (Sanhedrin 113a) tells a fascinating story, combining the two stories.
King Achav was a close friend of Chiel, and he went with Eliyahu to visit Chiel (either for the consecration of Yericho or for nichum aveilim- Rashi). Achav cynically questioned the effectiveness of Yehoshuas curse regarding the building of Yericho. When Eliyahu confirmed his belief in Yehoshuas curse, Achav said scornfully: "The curses of Yehoshuas master, Moshe, did not come true, as Moshe said that if the people will worship idolatry, Hashem will hold back rain. We worshipped," Achav said, "and the rain continued. Therefore, there is no reason to believe that Yehoshuas curses have any effect." In response, Eliyahu asked Hashem for the "keys to rain" and withheld rain from Achavs kingdom.
Based on the above, we can propose the following further background for the story. Yeravam ben Nevat, after rebelling against Shlomo, built calves for illegal worship, against the

explicit commandment of Moshe. This same Yeravam called his son Nadav, the same name as the son of Aharon who died because he challenged Moshes authority by making rulings in his presence. Yeravam was trying to indicate that he was the moral continuation of Aharon who had also erected a calf for worship. Another person who used the naming of a son as a means of creating a historical connection to someone who challenged Moshe was Chiel. He called his son Aviram, thus trying to continue the legacy of opposing Moshe, and he and Achav scoffed at what Moshe and his disciple, Yehoshua, stood for. Chiel built Yericho based on Achavs claim that Moshes threats were meaningless, making light of Yehoshua, his disciple. Indeed, Chiel paid the price, as his son died for this brazenness one Aviram like the other.


Did you notice any errors?
Any other problems?
Contact us: Beitel@yeshiva.org.il

Subscribe now to receive weekly Shiurim or a Daily Halacha free to your Email box!
Join the warm community of yeshiva.org.il...

Back to top