- Torah Portion and Tanach
- Ekev
Wonders and Miracles “Until This Day”
In the course of his long speech, Moshe urged all generations to contemplate Hashem’s mercy upon His nation through such miracles as the splitting of the sea. The pasuk says: "... which He did to the army of Egypt, to the horses and chariots, over whom He swept the waters of Yam Suf when they were chasing after you, and Hashem destroyed them until this day" (Devarim 11:4). It is difficult to understand the final phrase, "until this day," which usually means until the time the matter was written. Since it is referring to the death of the Egyptians, it seems irrelevant to say they are still destroyed. Would we think they were since reincarnated?
The early commentators suggested different explanations for this phrase. Ibn Ezra relates the phrase to the descendants of those killed 40 years earlier, who did not restore past Egyptian glory. The Ramban expands this, saying that the name of those who had the gall to chase after those redeemed by Hashem was permanently destroyed. The Ramban, though, does not see the scriptural basis for these ideas. He suggests that the lasting destruction refers to the previously legendary Egyptian fleet of horses and chariots, which never recovered. This is a sign of the lowliness of Egyptian society after 40 years of potential recovery time.
The Meshech Chochma paves a different "path through the sea." He says that Moshe was combating those who said that the splitting of the sea was an event that was reconcilable with nature by means of ebbs and flows. Moshe sent Bnei Yisrael to check if in the course of the subsequent 40 years, the phenomenon had occurred and reported that the event was unique "until this day." This proved that the event was a Divine miracle.
This point reminds us of a major philosophical debate. How should one relate to an apparently unexplainable miracle? One approach is that a miracle is a Divine divergence from the laws of nature and that it is inappropriate to look for a natural explanation. Another understanding is that the unusual events were prepared from the time of creation to occur as a built-in exception. A third approach is that there are physical explanations for miracles based on natural forces. For example, a volcanic eruption could have caused a thick veil of ashes that could have blackened Egypt. For it to have come at the time Moshe said it would made it a miracle. According to the final approach, we would not care if tides and winds could split the sea. Each approach will read our p’sukim differently.
Let us remember that we believe in the Creator’s Divine Providence in all of the miracles that have occurred to our nation in our times - according to whatever approach above one takes. We recall the rule that "whoever does not believe in miracles in the Middle East is not a realist."
The early commentators suggested different explanations for this phrase. Ibn Ezra relates the phrase to the descendants of those killed 40 years earlier, who did not restore past Egyptian glory. The Ramban expands this, saying that the name of those who had the gall to chase after those redeemed by Hashem was permanently destroyed. The Ramban, though, does not see the scriptural basis for these ideas. He suggests that the lasting destruction refers to the previously legendary Egyptian fleet of horses and chariots, which never recovered. This is a sign of the lowliness of Egyptian society after 40 years of potential recovery time.
The Meshech Chochma paves a different "path through the sea." He says that Moshe was combating those who said that the splitting of the sea was an event that was reconcilable with nature by means of ebbs and flows. Moshe sent Bnei Yisrael to check if in the course of the subsequent 40 years, the phenomenon had occurred and reported that the event was unique "until this day." This proved that the event was a Divine miracle.
This point reminds us of a major philosophical debate. How should one relate to an apparently unexplainable miracle? One approach is that a miracle is a Divine divergence from the laws of nature and that it is inappropriate to look for a natural explanation. Another understanding is that the unusual events were prepared from the time of creation to occur as a built-in exception. A third approach is that there are physical explanations for miracles based on natural forces. For example, a volcanic eruption could have caused a thick veil of ashes that could have blackened Egypt. For it to have come at the time Moshe said it would made it a miracle. According to the final approach, we would not care if tides and winds could split the sea. Each approach will read our p’sukim differently.
Let us remember that we believe in the Creator’s Divine Providence in all of the miracles that have occurred to our nation in our times - according to whatever approach above one takes. We recall the rule that "whoever does not believe in miracles in the Middle East is not a realist."

Mouth to Mouth (Spiritual) Resuscitation
Parahsat Ekev
Rabbi Moshe Erenreich | 5763

How much must I Bensch?
Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff | Av 19 5781

Parsha Summary: Ekev
Rabbi Stewart Weiss | Av 21 5775

To Lead is to Listen
Rabbi Jonathan Sacks | Av 19 5781

Rabbi Yossef Carmel
Head of "Eretz Hemda" Dayanut Kollel

Societal Improvement, Clouds, and Canopies
Tishrei 7 5776

More on Helping the Weak in Beit Din?
Shvat 29 5782

Waiting For What is Half Yours
Parashat Devarim
8 Av 5765

Seeing the Bow
5772

Forgetting a Day of Sefirat Ha'Omer
Rabbi Yosef Tzvi Rimon | 5778

Practices of the Tochacha
Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff | Elul 16 5776

Why Do Children Start With Vayikra?
Rabbi Shaul Yisraeli zt"l | 5771
Mourning Customs During the Omer
Rabbi Eliezer Melamed | 5764

Peace Rather Than Tripping
From Siach Shaul 353-4
Rabbi Shaul Yisraeli zt"l | Iyar 16 5782
Daily Mishna - Shevi'it 4, 5-6
Rabbi Moshe Leib Halberstadt | Iyar 17 5782
Daily Mishna - Shevi'it 4, 3-4
Rabbi Moshe Leib Halberstadt | Iyar 16 5782
