Beit Midrash
- Sections
- Chemdat Yamim
- Igrot Hare’aya
Body : The idea [you mentioned] of fulfilling the mitzva of Shemitta partially by not cultivating all of the possible land was raised and accepted in the past by the Chacham Bashi (Sephardic Chief Rabbi) Hagaon Harav Elyashar z"l of Yerushalayim. He did not employ your reasoning.
The way I look at it, if we do not cultivate a set percentage of fields, it will make the arrangement seem like a set system and give the impression that this is the proper way to fulfill the mitzva of Shemitta. Therefore, I expanded the degree of strictness, so that the following is the way we remind people that the mitzva of Shemitta is binding.
Even after the leniency based on the sale of the land, we permit working the fields only for that which is needed to keep the agricultural settlements viable. Every settlement has many plots, much more than a dunam per farmer, that are not needed for their survival. This includes gardens for beauty and certain produce that is not critical to the settlements’ economy. Certainly, uncultivated land is not included in the sale. In regard to these areas, the mitzva is fulfilled and it at least enables the existence of the laws of Shemitta to not be forgotten. This forces people to ask expert rabbis questions about the details. Certainly, the rulings depend on how pressing the needs are, and this reinforces the feeling that we have to try our hardest to fulfill the mitzva as completely as possible and the realization that the leniency of the sale is due to the pressing circumstances. This is more felt in the way we are doing it in comparison to setting a fixed percentage of land that is not used.
[We will skip over a paragraph dealing cryptically with Tamudic sources on these matters.] As far as whether the mitzva is considered "uprooted," the matter depends on various opinions. If the [laws of Shemitta in our times] are Rabbinic, then part of the mitzva is fulfilled by the fact that we do not allow, according to our instructions, a Jew to do the work that is forbidden by Torah law when Shemitta is a Torah-level mitzva. Only if Shemitta is presently forbidden based on Rabbinic law, then if all the Rabbinic laws are in force, it is considered creatively uprooting the whole mitzva, and then we have to rely on the fact that it does not apply to all fields. We have already instituted not to allow planting new fruit trees, and since most posit that planting trees is Rabbinically prohibited, we have thereby maintained some Rabbinic laws.

Igrot Hare’aya (200)
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit
169 - Maintaining a Friendship of the Spirit – #266 – part IV
170 - Keeping Shemitta Partially – #272
171 - The Need for a Broader Education – #274
Load More
Regarding the yeshiva [in Yafo], the "root" I began with is starting to take hold. On Rosh Chodesh Adar I, there was a test, and I see blessing in the project.
Your great book, which I love with my soul, is considered among us one of the very important courses of study. Sometimes I lecture to them on some of the chapters from within the book and add my own philosophy on the matters. I hope that when things are more settled, we will have your book on hand, and there will be very serious study and inquiry on it. In order to get the institution running financially, we have decided to have a raffle. We hope it will be officially approved soon by the governmental authorities.

Informing a Friend he Is Not Insulted – #320
Date and Place: 5 Menachem Av 5670 (1910), Rechovot (probably)
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit | Iyar 5785

Advice on Studying Spirituality – #301
Date and Place: 22 Iyar 5670 (1910), Yafo
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit | Shevat 5785

Good Work, Regrettable Language – #330
Date and Place: 21 Elul 5670 (1910), Yafo
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit | Sivan 5785

The State of Religion in Eretz Yisrael – #277 – part I
Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook Date and Place: 9 Adar I 5670 (1910), Yafo
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit | Cheshvan 5785

Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit

Limiting Exorbitant Lawyer’s Fees – part I
(Based on ruling 81120 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
Tishrei 29 5783

Limits of Interest Rate for Loan with Heter Iska – part I
based on ruling 80033 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
Sivan 8 5782

Connecting Disciplines in Torah Study
Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook 103 – part III
Sivan 15 5782
























