Which Is the Greater Value – Religiosity or Unity? | Rabbi Yossef Carmel | Beit Midrash

Sections
Parashat Hashavua

קטגוריה משנית

Torah Portion and Tanach
Re'e

Our parasha focuses on the "place that Hashem will choose" (see Devarim 12:5-11). From the time these Torah passages were given, it took a long time until the place was identified. Only in the time of King David, more than 400 years after the Exodus from Egypt, was the secret revealed that the place was Jerusalem.
When Jerusalem was chosen, not only was it elevated in standing, but all other places experienced a disqualification. This concept is referred to in Divrei Hayamim (I, 22:1): "David said: This is the House of Hashem, the Lord, and this is the altar for sacrifices for Israel." This is to exclude other places. In fact, among the halachot that this impacts is that once "the place" begins operating as the center of service of Hashem, it becomes forbidden to bring sacrifices in any other place, as is spelled out in our parasha.
Chazal (mishna, Zevachim 14:4-8) spell it out as follows: "Before the Mishkan (Tabernacle) was erected, bamot (private altars) were permitted … Once the Mishkan was erected, the bamot were forbidden… They came to Gilgal (after crossing the Jordan), bamot were permitted… They came to Shilo (long-time home of the Mishkan), the bamot were forbidden … They came to Nov and Givon (after the destruction of the Mishkan in Shilo), the bamot were permitted … They came to Jerusalem, the bamot were forbidden and they no longer [had the chance] of being permitted."
Jerusalem was chosen not only by Hashem, but also by the Nation of Israel (Ramban, Parashat Shoftim). This happened after David succeeded in uniting the nation, as found expression in the fact that there was only one army.
The choosing of Jerusalem had, among other things, a historical and a geographic rationale. Historically, although at the time of Yehoshua, the city was captured and burned (see Yehoshua 10:23-26; ibid. 12:10; Shoftim 1:7-8), it remained a non-Jewish city (see ibid. 1:21). No Israelite tribe settled there until the time of David, and, in fact, the halacha is: "Jerusalem was not divided up among the tribes" (Yoma 12a). This helped enable it to be the city of all and the city of peace between all parts of the nation.
Geographically, Jerusalem is situated on the border between the regions assigned to the tribes of Yehuda and Binyamin (see Yehoshua 15:5). The "watershed line" was the border; nowadays it goes down Yafo Street, from Davidka Square to the Central Bus Station and along Route 1 to the west. North of this line belongs to Binyamin; south of it belongs to Yehuda. Since Binyamin is a child of Rachel and Yehuda is the leader of Leah’s sons, this makes the city ideal for national unity.
We now can answer the question from our title. Choosing one place for worship of Hashem to the exclusion of others can cause religious concerns to take a step back. Considering the centrality of korbanot in those days, imagine closing all shuls in the world except the Kotel! Nevertheless, the added national unity took precedence over religiosity. "Built-up Jerusalem, as a city that was connected together" (Tehillim 122:3) – it connects all the parts of the nation, and it connects Jerusalem on Earth with Jerusalem on High. When unity wins, the service of Hashem is also elevated, strengthened, and receives greater significance and depth.

Re'e

Parashat Hashavua