YeshivaThe torah world Gateway Beit Midrash
Beit Midrash
- Sections
- Peninei Halakha
- Shabbat and Holidays
- The Tenth of Tevet
- The Minor Fasts' Halachot
The Sages prescribed the addition of a special berakha during the ĥazan’s repetition of the Amida on fast days. This addition is inserted between the berakhot of Go’el Yisrael and Refa’einu at Shaĥarit and Minĥa. It is only recited when there are at least six people in the congregation who are fasting, and the ĥazan must be one of them (sa 566:5).[13]
During the silent Amida, Aneinu is not recited as a separate berakha, but rather as an insertion in the middle of Shome’a Tefila (Ta’anit 13b). There are various customs regarding when we recite Aneinu. Some say that Aneinu should be recited in all three of the daily prayers; even though we do not fast at night, one should recite it in Ma’ariv because the day as a whole is called a fast day. Yemenite Jews and members of some Sephardic communities follow this custom. Some Sephardic communities have the custom to recite Aneinu only while they are fasting. Therefore, on the minor fasts they recite it in Shaĥarit and Minĥa, and on Tisha Be-Av they recite it in Ma’ariv as well (based on Ha-ma’or, Kaf Ha-ĥayim 565:17). Ashkenazim customarily recite Aneinu in Minĥa only, out of concern that one may become weak and break his fast after Shaĥarit. Then, his statement “on our fast day” will turn out to be a lie. Therefore, they recite Aneinu only at Minĥa, because one who has fasted this long will probably complete the fast (based on the Ge’onim and Rashi; Rema 565:3). Everyone should follow his family custom.
One who eats less than a kezayit or drinks less than melo lugmav is considered to still be fasting and should recite Aneinu. But if one ate or drank more than that, he has broken his fast and may not recite Aneinu.[14] (Nonetheless, he must continue fasting, as mentioned above, section 6.)
[13] sa 566:3 states that the ĥazan recites Aneinu only if there are ten people present who are fasting. However, many Aĥaronim explain that this is true only if a particular community establishes a fast day, but regarding the four fasts that the Prophets instituted, six people fasting are sufficient. See mb 566:14. When there are fewer than six people fasting, the ĥazan should recite Aneinu in Shome’a Tefila, as an individual would.
If the ĥazan forgets to recite Aneinu and has not yet said God’s name at the end of Refa’einu, he should go back and recite Aneinu in its proper place. If, however, he has already said God’s name, he should recite Aneinu in Shome’a Tefila, as an individual would. If he forgets to insert it even there, he should recite it, without its conclusion “Blessed are You…Who answers in time of distress,” after “…Who blesses His people Israel with peace,” before he says, “Yiyhu le-ratzon” (“May the words of my mouth…”; mb 119:19). An individual who forgets to recite Aneinu in Shome’a Tefila should insert it in the supplications that follow the Amida.
[14] There are varying opinions on this issue, and mb 568:3 states, based on Nehar Shalom, that one should recite Aneinu. In bhl 565:1, however, he cites Ma’amar Mordechai’s opinion that one who eats on a fast day should not recite Aneinu at all. Shevet Ha-Levi 5:60 reconciles this contradiction by explaining that one who is exempt from fasting should not recite Aneinu, whereas one who ate accidentally should recite it, because the fast applies to him. In my humble opinion, however, in light of the Ashkenazic custom not to recite Aneinu in Shaĥarit because one might not fast the entire day, we can clearly infer that one who has already eaten should not recite it. Many Sephardim have adopted this custom. Even one who merely intends to eat, but has not yet done so, should not recite Aneinu (sa 562:1; see mb ad loc. 6).
It is also unclear how much one needs to eat in order to be viewed as no longer fasting. Regarding Yom Kippur, the Sages say that eating a date’s bulk of food within the time it takes to eat half a loaf of bread, or drinking melo lugmav of fluid, is enough to eliminate the pangs of fasting. However, sa 568:1 states that one who eats a kezayit of food in the time it takes to eat half a loaf of bread has broken his fast, as a kezayit is the standard measure for all eating-related laws. See Piskei Teshuvot 568:1, which explains that the Aĥaronim debate the matter. Since there is uncertainty regarding this issue, it is better to be passive and not recite Aneinu if one ate a kezayit of food.

Rabbi Eliezer Melamed

Peninei Halakha 18. Torah Verses in the Prayers and in the Berakha of She-asa Li Kol Tzorki
Chapter 10: The Laws of Tisha Be-Av

The Laws of Purim 4. Traveling between Walled and Unwalled Cities
Chapter 17: Walled and Unwalled Cities

Peninei Halakha 9. Brit Mila, Hakhnasat Sefer Torah, and Bar Mitzva Celebrations
Chapter 3: Customs of Mourning during the Omer Period

D'varim Judaism’s Social Vision
Re’eh
Giving is more than an act of generosity—it is an essential part of human dignity that belongs to everyone, rich and poor alike. The ultimate goal of help is to empower others to stand on their own.

Kuzari -Rabbi Ari Shvat Kuzari class 9 - "Seeing is Believing" (parag. 21-30)
These paragraphs elaborate on the theme that seeing and knowing is better than any attempt to prove logically, and begins explaining the difference between Israel and gentiles.

Ein Aya Various Universal Stages of the Geula Process
Rav Kook examines the various stages of redemption, explaining how (in addition to the obvious oft-mentioned stages of ingathering the exiles, reviving the Hebrew language, army, state etc.) the messianic dream of world prosperity, the State of Israel and world unity can and are realistically and logically gradually coming true.

Kuzari -Rabbi Ari Shvat Kuzari class 8- "Answering Questions on the Kuzari's Proof from Mass Revelation
How do we know that the "claim" of mass revelation to 2,000,000 witnesses at Mt. Sinai is really true? This important class answers all of the questions skeptics ask about this claim of the Kuzari.

Ein Aya Armies Still Necessary for Balance & the War Against Wars
Rav Kook explains why the world was originally divided into the various seemingly contradicting ideologies and cultures, in order to develop each one respectively. Swords or armies symbolize how each respective ideology defends themselves, as well as deters their opposing ideologies and cultures. On the other hand, the messianic era will be one of peace, and Rav Kook explains the transition to that stage, which mankind is already undergoing.








