- Jewish Laws and Thoughts
- Observing Mitzvot
82
It wasn’t long before a guard took notice of Chaim’s new headwear. And its significance did not escape the guard’s notice.
"Jew! Take that off your head or die!" the guard sneered.
The gun aimed in Chaim’s direction made him flinch for a second, but Chaim quickly recovered his composure. He stood straighter and looked the guard in the eye, but said nothing.
"Jew, did you not hear me the first time? Don’t you know what a gun is?!" The guard was now yelling.
Chaim stood stoically, waiting.
"Are you not afraid to die?" gasped the guard.
Slowly, calmly, Chaim spoke. "My kippa, this piece of cloth on my head, means that I know there is someone above me. He and He alone determines whether I live or die. So, no, I am not afraid to die. You believe that life and death are in the hands of Brezhnev, so you are terrified of death."
Was Chaim allowed to endanger his life, in order to continue wearing his kippa?
Answer of Rabbi Yaakov Ariel, shlita:
If a Jew is given the choice to commit idolatry, sexual immorality or murder, or be killed, the Jew must choose to give up his life rather than violate any of those three sins. However, if it is a matter of committing any other sin, or being killed, the Jew should commit the sin, and prolong his life. These rules apply under general circumstances. However, at a time when Jews are being pursued, in an attempt to convert Jews to a foreign religion, a Jew must give up his life rather than violate any prohibition, even a relatively minor commandment. (Sanhedrin 74, Shulchan Aruch 157, 1)
In Russia, at the time of this story, Jews were being actively pursued, in order to draw them away from Judaism. Therefore, Chaim was correct in refusing to remove his kippa.
It is important to note that, if the guard would, himself, have forcibly removed the kippa from Chaim’s head, Chaim would have been allowed to remove his kippa on his own. This is because Chaim would be incapable of observing the mitzva regardless, so it would make no difference if the kippa was removed by the guard or by Chaim. (See Biur HaGra on the above mentioned Shulchan Aruch, note 10.)
The authorities debate whether a Jew is allowed to give up his life under circumstances in which he is not actually required to give up his life. According to Maimonides, it would be forbidden for the person to give up his life, but according to others, it would be permitted. (See the commentary of the Shach on the above mentioned Shulchan Aruch, se’if katan 10.) In practice, many Jews throughout the generations chose to give up their lives, even in situations in which they were not obligated to do so.
In summary: Because our story took place at a time when the Russians were actively seeking to prevent Jews from keeping the Torah, Chaim acted correctly in choosing to give up his life, rather than remove his kippa.

Heaven Help Us
Rabbi Stewart Weiss | Tevet 12 5782
Aveirah Lishma- The Concept of Sinning as Sometimes Helpful
Ein Aya Shabat Chapter B Paragraph 51 (p2)
Rabbi Ari Shvat | Tevat 6 5775
What is the Goal of the Mitzvot?
Ein Aya Shabat Chapter B Paragraph 15 (p2)
Rabbi Ari Shvat | Tamuz 29 5773

How to Understand Murdering Amalek & Other Mitzvot which Seem "Immoral"?
Rabbi Ari Shvat | Adar 7 5781
The Principles of Hagala
Chapter Ten-Part Three
Rabbi Eliezer Melamed | 5775

Introduction and Biography of the Noda B’Yehuda
Various Rabbis | Tevet 8 5776

The Maharal of Prague: An Introduction
Rabbi Eliyahu Brin | Cheshvan, 5761
The Strike: Jewish Law’s Say
Rabbi Eliezer Melamed | Adar, 5763

Ask the Rabbi: Anonymous Return of Stolen Money
Rabbi Daniel Mann | Nisan 5785

Orchot Tzaddikim class 56, "Stay Quiet" i
Rabbi Ari Shvat | Nisan 5785
Daf Yomi Makkot Daf 11
R' Eli Stefansky | 21 Nisan 5785
