- Sections
- P'ninat Mishpat
21
Case: The plaintiff (=pl) hired the defendant (=def) to do renovations for 225,000 shekels. Def was to finish by 26/11/2010 and was to compensate pl at a rate of 5,000 shekels a month for delays, in order to cover pl’s rent during the renovations. Def did not finish on time; pl asked him to stop working and had someone else finish the work. Pl claims to have paid def for almost all the job and has had to pay others (including for expenses during def’s work that def was supposed to cover). Pl also claims 25,000 shekel for the project finishing five months late. Def does not know exactly how late he was but claims it was much less than five months and that the work done at the end did not prevent pl from returning home. Def also claims that the prices pl claimed based on those who finished the job were exaggerated and that pl added building requests of def, not included in the contract, which were not yet paid for.
Ruling: At first glance, since pl has a specific claim about how late def was and def admits he was late but does not know by how much, def is a modeh b’miktzat (makes a partial admission), who is obligated to pay when he cannot swear on the rest of the claim due to lack of knowledge (Bava Metzia 97b). However, although def admits partially regarding the element of rent compensation, he does not admit that he, overall, owes money to pl because the amount that he claims is due to him for unpaid work exceeds the amount he admits to owe.

P'ninat Mishpat (762)
Various Rabbis
575 - Bad Advice Causing Loss of Mortgage Rights – part II
576 - Renovations that Did Not Finish On Time
577 - Disagreements Between a Supplier and a Store
Load More
On the other hand, def did not document the extra work that he did for pl, and pl agrees to only part of those items that def claimed. Since the amount of matters about which there is factual agreement is small, it does not make sense to spend the litigants’ money on an expert to give a price appraisal of these elements.
Since neither side sufficiently corroborated their claims that they are owed more than they owe their counterpart, we will employ the rule of "he who wants to extract money needs to provide proof," and neither side has to pay the other.

Conditions on a Get After it Was Given to an Agent
Various Rabbis | 5771

Ending Rental Due to Extenuating Circumstances
Various Rabbis | Tevet 5768

When a Couple Both Want the House After Divorce
Various Rabbis | 4 Elul 5767

P'ninat Mishpat: Unpaid Fees of a No-Show to Beit Din
based on ruling 84052 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit | Shevat 5784
“Hatov Vehametiv”
Rabbi Eliezer Melamed | 5769

How Does a Person Convert to Judaism?
Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff

What Do These "Shovavim" Days Mean to Us?
Rabbi Gur Aria Argamon | Tevet 20 5783
“Hatov Vehametiv”
Rabbi Eliezer Melamed | 5769
Daf Yomi Sanhedrin Daf 53
R' Eli Stefansky | 10 Shevat 5785

THANK TRUMP BUT SING TO G-D & the IDF- Parshat Beshalach & Tu BiShvat
Rabbi Ari Shvat | Shevat 5785 11

Defense vs. Lashon HaRah
The Speaker, the Spoken & the Receiver via Rav Kook's New Account of Mephiboshet
Rabbi Ari Shvat | 12 Shevat 5784
