- Sections
- Bemare Habazak - Rabbis Questions
- Family and Society
- Basics of Financial Laws
Answer: [Some of the basics of the matter of adjudication in secular court are discussed in, among other places, Living the Halachic Process V:I-2.]

Bemare Habazak - Rabbis Questions (586)
Rabbi Daniel Mann
333 - Trying on Tefillin at Night
334 - Is Partial Compliance to Choshen Mishpat Helpful?
335 - Moving Kugel into a Cholent Pot – Revisited
Load More
There are practical differences (some certain, some possible) between these elements, with each one applying to cases the other might not. The matter of taking money in an unauthorized manner might not apply when: 1. Both sides prefer the secular courts and thereby authorize the other side to receive the "fruits" of their ruling. 2. The side that won checked responsibly with halachic experts (including by telling all of the arguments the other side could raise) that he deserves the court’s award. The matter of preferring another judicial system may not apply if: 1. There is no beit din available to adjudicate (see Living the Halachic Process V:I-2). 2. From the perspective of one litigant, he had no choice because the other litigant refused to go to beit din.
If one has already received a favorable ruling from a secular court, is he allowed to accept the award without further investigation? The matter of disgracing the Torah has already occurred – in some cases he or both sides were at fault; in other cases, the other side forced him. The question is, in each of the scenarios, what to do about the money which he might have or might not have been awarded in beit din. See opinions on the matter in Techumin vol. XXV, p. 249-253 and Eretz Hemdah’s position paper from 5774.
Would it make a difference if the specific matter is something in which the secular courts follow Choshen Mishpat? As long as the system is based on a different judicial authority, the problem of disgrace remains. The Shulchan Aruch (CM 26:1) rules that one is not allowed to go to a non-Jewish court even regarding a topic in which their laws are identical to Halacha. The Tzitz Eliezer (XII:82), in expounding on a letter by Rav Tzvi Pesach Frank, says that the situation is not better and is, in some ways, worse regarding Jewish courts that adopt a non-Jewish system. In such cases, the matter of taking money not coming to the litigant is less likely to be a problem. On the other hand, those who are not trained in Halacha cannot be trusted to implement its rules correctly. Rav Yaakov Ariel (Techumin vol. I, p. 319-328) argues that accepting certain rulings based on halachic sources (what Israeli academia calls Mishpat Ivri) does not remove the halachic and philosophical problems of going to a secular court. On the other hand, purposely and increasingly adopting elements of Choshen Mishpat would (if it occurred) lessen the sting of rejecting Torah-based justice.
In summary, there are small gains when secular law adopts halachic laws and principles, but it does not remove or dramatically alter the halachic and philosophical problems of adjudicating before their courts.

Ask the Rabbi: Beracha upon Returning Tzitzit
Rabbi Daniel Mann | Tevet 5785

Ask the Rabbi: An Avel Attending a Seudat Hodaya
Rabbi Daniel Mann | Cheshvan 5785

Mistakes in Kiddush of Yom Tov that Falls on Shabbat
Rabbi Daniel Mann | Nissan 10 5782

Ask the Rabbi: Kiddush and Havdala in Shul
Rabbi Daniel Mann | Tishrei 5785

Hatzalah and Shabbos Emergencies
Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff | 5769

Heating Pad on Shabbat
Rabbi Daniel Mann | Kislev 11 5780

Tzel, Tzelem, Tzela – A New Look on the Creation of Man
Rabbi Yossef Carmel | Tishrei 24 57777

Tzel, Tzelem, Tzela – A New Look on the Creation of Man
Rabbi Yossef Carmel | Tishrei 24 57777

Ask the Rabbi: Amen on a Non-Beracha
Rabbi Daniel Mann | Shevat 5785

Parashat Hashavua: The Ten Commandments – A Blueprint for World Justice
Rabbi Yossef Carmel | Shevat 5785
