The King’s Clothes … | Rabbi Yossef Carmel | Beit Midrash

Beit Midrash

Torah Portion and Tanach
Bamidbar
Chukat

קטגוריה משנית

Sections
Chemdat Yamim
Parashat Hashavua

Parashat Hashavua Series'Library Piskei Din (Hebrew)Test Yourself

The significance of the passing of Aharon’s clothes to Elazar, before the former’s death, of which we read this week, represents passing on his job and the authority of the Kohen Gadol from father to son. We have explained in the past that when Melachim begins with David’s lack of benefit from the warming powers of his clothes, it means that he had a problem passing on his kingdom to his heir apparent. That is why Chazal understood that David was criticized for cutting off the edge of Shaul’s garment when hiding in a cave as Shaul pursued him (Shmuel I, 24:4-5). It is not simple that he should be criticized, considering that he could have killed Shaul instead. According to what we have said, the matter is clear. Kingdom is something that one needs to receive, not take. By cutting off the piece of the garment, he was demonstrating taking it by force from Shaul, and this was wrong even as a symbolic act.
Yonatan acted in a very different way. After David killed Goliat and thereby saved the nation and was brought before his father, Shaul, Yonatan understood that David would receive his father’s crown instead of Yonatan. Yonatan could have tried to fight destiny, remove David, and restore his own status. Instead, Yonatan removed his cloak and his arms and gave them to David (ibid. 18:1-4). That was Yonatan’s way of showing David that he actively accepted the passing of the status of heir to David.
Let us see another example of clothes as a sign of status. Eliyahu had three identifying elements as a prophet: his hair, a belt on his waist (Melachim II, 1:8) and a special aderet (cloak).
Eliyahu had two primary disciples: Elisha and Yonah ben Amittai (the son of the Tzorfatit, whom Eliyahu had brought back to life). He could not pass on his hair, but Eliyahu did pass on his aderet to Elisha, once temporarily as a sign that Elisha should follow him (Melachim I, 19:19) and once when he was taken up to the heaven (Melachim II, 2:4). Elisha apparently passed on his belt to Yonah, as Chazal tell us that he was the "son of the prophet" who was asked to carry out Eliyahu’s instructions to Elisha, which included girding his loins (see ibid. 9:1).
We see similar phenomena in regard to non-Jewish kings and their Jewish associates. Paroh gave his signet to Yosef and clothed him with special royal clothes to signify his appointment as viceroy (Bereishit 41:42). More than a thousand years later, Achashverosh presented Mordechai with special royal garments (Esther 8:15). So we see that clothes were always a part of transferring authority.
Finally, we should point out that Moshe did not pass on any clothing to Yehoshua when he "left the stage" of history. Apparently, Moshe was on such a high spiritual level that it was not possible to express leadership transfer in such a manner. Rather he passed on hod (some sort of spiritual glow) to Yehoshua (Bamidbar 27:18-20).
May we merit leadership that strives for such levels.

Parashat Hashavua

Chukat