- Sections
- P'ninat Mishpat
90
Case: The plaintiff (=pl) bought property from a building company (=def), which was supposed to complete construction to by 20.06.2014. After negotiations, the contract included a penalty of 2,800 shekels a month against def for lateness, starting from two months after the target date. Pl received the apartment more than 18 months late. According to a new law, a buyer is compensated for more than 60 days of lateness (retroactively from the beginning) according to the following schedule – 150% of the apartment’s rental value for the first 8 months; 125% of the value after that. Buyers cannot waive their legal rights. Pl claims that the apartment’s value is 4,200 shekels and claims 105,275 shekels. Def claims the payment should be drastically reduced on two general grounds. Since the contract included an arbitration agreement to beit din, halacha, which recognizes the sides’ agreement, rather than the law, should be binding. Therefore: 1. The monthly rate is 2,800. 2. Payments start only after two months. 3. The contract gives a two month extension for the buyer’s requesting building change, which pl made. Furthermore, the following delays, which were beyond def’s control, push off the target date: 4. (Arab) workers could not come to the site during the fighting in the summer of 2014. 5. The water authority illegitimately delayed connecting the water supply, which delayed by months receipt of a Tofes 4, needed for legal occupancy. 6. The fire department improperly delayed approval for several weeks. 7. Pl refused to receive control of the apartment for two months after it was ready.
Ruling: We start with a discussion on whether to follow the contract or the law. The written policy of our beit din is to accept the law of the land when it is one that if brought before us, we would accept it. One factor that helps us want to accept a law is when it has a basis in a Torah principle. Another is when logic dictates that it improves society. Areas in which we are less likely to accept the laws are when they set down general rules of justice, for which we prefer the Torah’s justice. In cases where the reason to accept the law is that it represents standard practice, the existence of a contract overrides standard practice.

P'ninat Mishpat (774)
Various Rabbis
417 - Independent-Minded Architect – part II
418 - Calculating Late Penalty According to Contract or Law – part I
419 - Calculating Late Penalty According to Contract or Law – part II
Load More
Next time, we will look at and apply the law’s provisions to this case.

Profits from Formerly Joint Swimming Pool – part III
(based on ruling 81110 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit | 19 Sivan 5784

P'ninat Mishpat: Unsuccessful Transfer of Yeshiva – part II
based on ruling 82138 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit | Adar 5784

Conditions of the Leasing of a Community Supermarket
(based on ruling 83035 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit | 10 Tammuz 5784

P'ninat Mishpat: Who Has Rights in the Courtyard?
based on ruling 81059 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit | Kislev 5784

Interesting Chol Hamoed Questions
Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff | Tishrei 12 5781

This is the Way We Bake Our Bread!
Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff | Sivan 21 5775

The Significance of Tachanun
Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff | 5772

This is the Way We Bake Our Bread!
Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff | Sivan 21 5775
Daf Yomi Shevuot Daf 17
R' Eli Stefansky | 20 Iyar 5785

Efforts to Buy Land – #315
Date and Place: 28 Sivan 5670 (1910), Yafo
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit | Iyar 5785

P'ninat Mishpat: A Used Car with a Tendency for Engine Problems
based on ruling 84034 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit | Iyar 5784
