- Sections
- P'ninat Mishpat
Case: The plaintiff (=pl) is a lawyer (/owner of a law firm) who represented the defendant (=def), a wealthy businessman (/businesses he owned) in many matters, including several multimillion-shekel (attempted) purchases. Def paid pl more than 1.6 million shekels over 4 years, but pl claims that he is still owed more than 2 million shekels.
Issue #6: Pl encouraged def to buy a major property. After months of research and negotiations, led by pl, def wrote that he would pay pl1,000,000 shekels for the completed deal on the day he would pay for the purchase. Soon thereafter, pl signed a letter of intent for the purchase at 64,000,000 shekels, conditional on a due diligence check and completion of a contract. Pl and def’s representative in Israel found only minor issues in their check, which were thereafter mainly addressed and the contract was almost complete when def suddenly backed out. Pl claims that def did this because of a drop in the dollar (def’s means of pay was in dollars). Def blamed problems with the property and accused pl of improper actions, including making unauthorized changes to the letter of intent and conflict of interest. The sellers sued def for breach of contract, who sued pl for responsibility, and def agreed to a major out-of-court settlement. Pl demands 1,000,000 shekel for finishing the deal; def refuses and is countersuing for causing the settlement.

P'ninat Mishpat (762)
Various Rabbis
383 - Lawyer’s Rights to Full Fees from Reluctant Client – part IV
384 - Lawyer’s Rights to Full Fees from Reluctant Client – part V
385 - A Loan or a Gift? – part I
Load More
Does pl deserves full payment for bringing the deal to preliminary agreement? According to Israeli law, which was the basis of def’sinteraction with the seller, the signed letter of intent bound def, unless due diligence uncovered weighty issues or the seller acted in bad faith in negotiating a final contract. The drop in the dollar, the apparent issue, is an external matter which would not be a valid legal excuse (halacha apparently agrees, although the matter is not obvious – see Rama, Choshen Mishpat 304:11).
Nevertheless, pl does not deserve full payment. Regarding ashadchan who brings a couple to engagement, there are different practices whether he gets paid immediately or only after the marriage. The main opinion is the latter (Rama, CM 185:10), and he also does not get paid if they break off the engagement (even given financial repercussions). Our case is similar. Pl and def’s agreement’s stipulation of payment when def paid for the purchase implies that this would have been the completion of pl’s job.
Nevertheless, def must pay pl significantly more than his per-hour rate for the following reasons. There was an earlier agreement for pay, for a large but smaller amount of money, which did not link payment to payment for the property. Since it was illegitimate for def to back out, his obligation to pl on the matter on the eve of the letter of intent should be seen, to a certain extent, as a "done deal." According to the dynamics of the case, pl was more than just a lawyer in this matter, but was involved personally in recommending to each other both sides, with whom he had a working relationship (as def knew but later denied). Backing out of the deal improperly caused a rift between pl and the seller, and this is a factor in determining the level of def’s responsibility.Pl is to receive 350,000 shekels for bringing the deal to the point it reached.

P'ninat Mishpat: Dispute upon Ending Rental
based on ruling 83133 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit | Tishrei 5784

An Abrupt End to a Rental
Various Rabbis | Tevet 5768

Compensating for a Governmentally Destroyed House – part II
Based on ruling 75040 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit | Cheshvan 22 5781

P'ninat Mishpat: Counter Claims – part II (Child Care, Foundations)
based on ruling 81059 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit | Tevet 5784

Tzel, Tzelem, Tzela – A New Look on the Creation of Man
Rabbi Yossef Carmel | Tishrei 24 57777

Hatzalah and Shabbos Emergencies
Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff | 5769

Heating Pad on Shabbat
Rabbi Daniel Mann | Kislev 11 5780

Tzel, Tzelem, Tzela – A New Look on the Creation of Man
Rabbi Yossef Carmel | Tishrei 24 57777

How the Sacrifices Made the Torah More Approachable
Rabbi Mordechai Hochman | 16 Shvat 5785
Daf Yomi Sanhedrin Daf 56
R' Eli Stefansky | 13 Shevat 5785
