- Sections
- Bemare Habazak - Rabbis Questions
- Shabbat and Holidays
- Shabbat
1315
Answer: Much of this answer is developed at length in a teshuva that will appear in Bemareh Habazak IX:10. We will add points that apply to this case.
There are two halachic issues to consider: commerce on Shabbat and amira l’nochri (requesting a non-Jew to do work on Shabbat).
Rashi (Beitza 36b) gives two possible reasons for the prohibition on commerce on Shabbat: it is against the navi’s instructions to refrain from mundane activities; it may bring one to writing. Simple logic dictates that when the Jew’s involvement took place before Shabbat and matters are finished up by others or automatically, the prohibition should not apply. However, Rabbi Akiva Eiger (Shut I:159) extends the prohibition to cases in which the interaction was during the week but it was to take effect on Shabbat. So arguably, regardless of when you arranged it, the payment of your debt (which is also commerce – Rama, Orach Chayim 307:11) on Shabbat is forbidden.
One does not need to be concerned by this opinion for (a combination of) two reasons. 1. It is far from clear that we accept R. Akiva Eiger’s opinion (see opinions in referenced teshuva). After all, even doing full melachot before Shabbat that finish by themselves on Shabbat are permitted. Furthermore, the best answer for R. Akiva Eiger from sources (including Shulchan Aruch, OC 307:4) that a Jew can have a non-Jew acquire something on his behalf on Shabbat is that a transaction finished off by a non-Jew is permitted even if one that finished by itself is forbidden. If so, there would not be a problem in this case.

Bemare Habazak - Rabbis Questions (590)
Rabbi Daniel Mann
171 - Shabbat Cruises
172 - Automatic Payment on Shabbat or Yom Tov
173 - Practicing Saying “V’ten Tal U’Matar"
Load More
We could stop here, but we do not want to imply that there is no other logic for leniency. One should be aware that amira l’nochri is among the most complicated areas of hilchot Shabbat, and people should become accustomed to asking, as there could be more room for leniency or stringency than one might expect.
We should consider whether the bank is working for you when making the transfer. One might be able to look at the transaction between the bank and the credit card company as being done primarily on behalf of the credit card company. They are the ones who initiate the payment on a monthly basis, when the time comes, and they receive the money. Perhaps we should view your instructions to the bank as acquiescing in advance to the payment (albeit if it was not worth your while, you wouldn’t do it). These analyses may differ from case to similar-sounding case.
It is also possible that giving the order during the week to pay on a date that usually falls during the week, is not considered amira l’nochrieven if, down the line, it happens to fall out on Shabbat or Yom Tov. There are several precedents (e.g., Mishna Berura 247:10 and Mishbetzot Zahav, OC 307:2) of the idea that statements that cause the non-Jew’s work on Shabbat may still not be considered direct enough to be amira l’nochri. However, it is very tricky to apply such a concept.
The bottom line is that you can allow these bank transfers arrangement to continue no matter when they fall out.

Ask the Rabbi: Should Kiddush Levana Be Done with a Minyan?
Rabbi Daniel Mann | Cheshvan 5785

Ask the Rabbi: Right Pronunciation of Shehakol
Rabbi Daniel Mann | Kislev 5785

Hamapil for Those Who Take a Long Time to Fall Asleep
Rabbi Daniel Mann | Shvat 5773

Who Drinks Kiddush/Havdala Wine and Why?
Rabbi Daniel Mann | Elul 2 5775

Rabbi Daniel Mann

Davening Early on Shavuot
Iyar 26 5777

Tisha B’Av Pushed Off Until Sunday
Av 6 5776

Ribbit in a Loan from an Irrevocable Trust Fund
Adar 7 5777

Tazria Metzora Question
5772

How Does a Heter Iska Work?
Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff | 5770

The Seder Avodah of Yom Kippur
Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff | 5768
Daf Yomi Sanhedrin Daf 87
R' Eli Stefansky | 14 Adar 5785

Fasting on the Wedding Day
Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff | Sivan 9 5779

P'ninat Mishpat: Upper Property’s Responsibility for Flooding
based on ruling 82008 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit | Adar 5784

Public Response to Zealous Defense of Rav Kook – #308
Date and Place: 15 Sivan 5670 (1910), Yafo
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit | Adar 5785
