- Sections
- Bemare Habazak - Rabbis Questions
837
Answer: The short answer is that there is probably, a small preference.
The gemara (Berachot 6a) says: "A person’s prayer is heard only in a beit knesset, as it says: ‘… to hear the praise and the prayer’ (Melachim I, 8:28) – at the place of the praise, there should be the prayer." The Rambam (Tefilla 8:1) cites this idea with the addition that the prayers will not be "heard at all times" outside of a beit knesset. This would seem to be an important reason to daven specifically in a shul, and indeed the Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chayim 90:9) writes: "A person should try to daven in a beit knesset with the community." He continues that there is also a preference to daven in a beit knesset even if he will be davening there alone (this is the subject of a machloket Rishonim - see Beit Yosef, OC 90).
The question is whether all davening out of a beit knesset is inferior and to what extent. The Magen Avraham (90:15) cites, as the reason for the Shulchan Aruch’s recommendation, the idea of b’rov am hadrat melech (roughly, it is preferable to the King when there is a large group). The Pri Megadim (ad loc.) posits that even without the factor ofb’rov am, a shul is always a preference, as he assumes that the preferences of a minyan and a shul are both called for. This is not a clear conclusion. The Tzelach (Berachot 6a) says that the important thing is having one’s tefilla heard and that this can be accomplishedeither by davening in a shul, even as an individual, or by davening with a minyan, even out of shul.
There is another Talmudic source about davening in a beit knesset. The gemara (Berachot 8a) says that whoever does not daven in a community’s shul is called a bad neighbor and is slated for exile. The Chida (Machazik Beracha 90:4) says that this does not apply if the person davens elsewhere with a minyan because the Divine Presence dwells wherever a minyan is praying. However, he continues to say that in order to receive the full positive impact, it must be in a place that is "set for holiness." The definition of "set for holiness" is not always clear. Public vs. private ownership is not the issue (see Rama 153:7). Whether steps were taken to allow occasional use of the place for meals, especially when limited to mitzva-related eating (see complex issue in Shulchan Aruch, OC 151:11; Igrot Moshe OC I:45) is also probably not critical. However, using one’s living room for a minyan after a regular shiur or a daily Mincha minyan in a business’s board room does not turn these places into batei knesset.

Bemare Habazak - Rabbis Questions (595)
Rabbi Daniel Mann
179 - Conflict Between “Salvation Day” and Yahrtzeit
180 - Preference of Davening in a Shul
181 - Stopping to Rent Out to a Shul
Load More
We are generally strong believers in the importance of community on various grounds. We note that Rav Kook, commenting on Berachot 6a, says that it is important to show that one connects his prayer to the matter of publicizing Hashem’s greatness and that this is done most profoundly in the communal setting (Ein Ayah, Berachot 1: 48,49). That being said, sometimes even the most communally oriented people have recourse to davening outside a shul.

Backing Out of an Oral Offer to a Potential Worker
Rabbi Daniel Mann | Cheshvan 22 5781

Ask the Rabbi: Anonymous Return of Stolen Money
Rabbi Daniel Mann | Nisan 5785

Dancing at a Wedding during your Sefira Period
Rabbi Daniel Mann | Iyar 17 5778

Ask the Rabbi: Not Taking Vacation Time on Chol Hamo’ed
Rabbi Daniel Mann | Nisan 5785

Rabbi Daniel Mann

Reciting Kri’at Shema at the Very End of its Time
Sivan 21 5779

Yitro Question
5772

Timtum Halev – Part II
Adar I 8 5776

Washing Hands with Soap on Yom Kippur
Tishrei 4 5776

Ask the Rabbi: Anonymous Return of Stolen Money
Rabbi Daniel Mann | Nisan 5785

Orchot Tzaddikim class 56, "Stay Quiet" i
Rabbi Ari Shvat | Nisan 5785

Parashat Hashavua: Two Sides to a Coin
Rabbi Yossef Carmel | Nisan 5785
