- Sections
- P'ninat Mishpat
361
Ruling: [Last time, we saw that def had a right to fire pl. Now we will discuss compensation for lost income.]
Unfortunately, it is accepted that teachers’ status is not secure until the beginning of the school year. However, a principal’s oral commitment to continue the teacher’s employment cannot be ignored, for the following reasons: If the teacher starts his preparations for the year, that serves as a kinyan on the new employment period. Secondly, since according to local practice, an oral contract is binding, it is possible that it is binding through situmata (a generic kinyan for that which is accepted by society).
Another reason the commitment is significant is that it can create a situation of garmi (semi-direct damage). The Shulchan Aruch rules that if someone hires a worker who could have found another job and then backs out when it is too late to find a job, the employer must pay the part of his salary that corresponds to the damage of being unemployed (poel batel, which is less than the salary of one who has to work). During the month that pl thought he was employed, it would have been much easier for him to have looked for another job.
In this case, pl and def dispute whether def assured pl he had a job, and therefore, def is obligated to take a rabbinic oath that he did not do so. For some time, beit din does not administer oaths, but makes compromises in lieu of the oaths. In addition to compromises due to untaken oaths, beit din also has the authority to rule as seems fit to them in cases where the truth cannot be determined, especially by employing compromises. The situation in which there is a lack of clarity about a teacher’s professional status is a morally inappropriate one. The teacher is expected to show allegiance to the school, while the school "controls the steering wheel." Beit din encourages the school to devise a re-hiring policy that is fair to both sides and allows each side to plan. In this case, beit din requires the school to pay for two months of pl’s salary, in addition to normal severance pay.

P'ninat Mishpat (770)
Various Rabbis
211 - The Firing of a Teacher
212 - The Firing of a Teacher
213 - Switching from a Secular Court to Beit Din
Load More

P'ninat Mishpat: Unpaid Fees of a No-Show to Beit Din
based on ruling 84052 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit | Shevat 5784

Returning Pre-Payment for a Rental
Various Rabbis | Shvat 5768

Altercation with a Photographer – part I
Various Rabbis | Tammuz 9 5777

P'ninat Mishpat: Disagreement on Length of Rental Commitment – part II
(based on ruling 83043 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit | 13 Elul 5783

Sifting the Makom HaMikdash
Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff | 5769

The Kashrus of Raisin Juice and Wine
Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff

What do we do when Pesach falls on Shabbat?
Rabbi Yosef Tzvi Rimon | 5778

Zera Yisrael
Rabbi Yossef Carmel | Tevet 12 5777
Daf Yomi Makkot Daf 3
R' Eli Stefansky | 13 Nisan 5785

Ask the Rabbi: Not Taking Vacation Time on Chol Hamo’ed
Rabbi Daniel Mann | Nisan 5785

CLEANING FOR PESACH: BETWEEN 'FEELING' & 'BEING' RELIGIOUS
Rabbi Ari Shvat | Nisan 5785
