Beit Midrash

  • Sections
  • P'ninat Mishpat
קטגוריה משנית
To dedicate this lesson
undefined
Case: A woman (=pl) who is in the process of divorce wants to collect her ketuba, which has a very high shekel sum in it. The husband (=def) claims that he wrote such a large sum in exchange for his receiving half of the apartment she owned. He says that when he later decided to give her back full ownership of the apartment, she relinquished her rights to the special ketuba. She denies this claim. There are two noteworthy elements to the ketuba: the large element of the ketuba is written in the section that deals with property she brought into the marriage for him to keep (nichsei tzon barzel); there are two blank lines between the end of the body and the signatures.

Ruling: It is possible to read the ketuba in a manner that there is a linkage between his receiving part of the apartment and his obligation for the large ketuba, but that is not clear. Normally we say that he who needs the document to obtain money has to prove that the language is to be read as proves his case. However, here it is different because def’s obligation to her definitely took effect, and the question is only whether he paid it off, which he needs to prove. Even when one who owes money has witnesses that he gave money to the creditor but did not know in what context, he can claim that it was for another debt upon which there is no contract (Choshen Mishpat 58). Therefore, we accept pl’s claim that the full obligation in the ketuba is unconditional, and def needs to bring proof that he gave her something as payment.
In general, a document that has more than one blank line before the signatures is an invalid document because its holder can add a line with whatever he wants (Shulchan Aruch, CM 45:6). However, the situation is different when the couple leaves a copy of the ketuba at the Rabbanut offices. Although we are of the opinion that one cannot use that ketuba to extract payment, that is because the wife may have already received payment with the main ketuba. However, it can be used to prove that the content of the main ketuba is not a forgery since no one has access to the Rabbanut ketuba. Additionally, that which one cannot use a document which leaves room for forging is to extract money from those who bought property from the debtor. However, one can extract payment from the debtor (ibid. 7). While the debtor can claim in such a case that he already paid (ibid.) that is only if there is question whether there was an act of payment. However, over here, when everyone agrees about the obligation and there is only a question whether to consider the return of ownership to pl as payment of the ketuba, the problem with the ketuba is not important. It is also difficult to claim that a ketuba was already paid because a ketuba is meant to be paid only after the marriage is dissolved (by divorce or the husband’s death), and one needs proof that he paid a debt early (Bava Batra 5a).
fast navigation
Lessons
    undefined
    Beha'alotcha

    The Consolation of Lighting the Menora - Rav Kook at the Third Shabbat Meal

    15 Sivan 5784
    undefined
    Beha'alotcha

    Why Was Miriam Punished?

    Rabbi Yosef Tzvi Rimon | 5777
    undefined
    Prayer

    ?How we should dress for Prayer

    Chapter five-part two

    Chapter five-part two

    Rabbi Eliezer Melamed | 5775
    undefined
    Prayer

    Who Can Be Counted in a Minyan?

    Chapter Two-part three

    Can every ten men be a Minyan or are there other conditions?

    Rabbi Eliezer Melamed
    undefined
    P'ninat Mishpat

    Historical View of Rav Mordechai Yaakov Breish (Chelkat Yaakov)

    Various Rabbis | 5775
    undefined
    Happy Occasions

    Fasting and Feasting on a Yahrzeit

    “My father’s yahrzeit falls during the week of sheva brachos for my grandson. May I attend the sheva brachos?” "My yahrzeit falls on Shabbos this year. Do I fast on Friday or Sunday instead?" "I usually fast on my father’s yahrzeit, but someone is honoring me with sandaka’us on that day. Do I fast, and do I need to be matir neder in the event that it is permitted to eat?"

    Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff
    undefined
    Revivim

    Halakha on Abortion of Fetuses with Severe Abormalities

    A fetus is considered a living entity in regards to certain laws, but there is no penalty of death for taking its life. What do the rabbinical decisors say?

    Rabbi Eliezer Melamed
    undefined
    The Haggadah

    Shir Hashirim

    Deeper meaning of Shir Hashirim, The Song Of Songs.

    Various Rabbis | 5770
    undefined
    The Giving of the Torah

    The Day of the Rains and the Giving of the Torah

    According to our Sages, The Day of the Rain is as great as, or even greater than the day of the Giving of the Torah. The basis for this comparison is discussed in depth, as well as additional aspects of the connection between the rains and the Torah.

    Rabbi Uzi Kalchaim zt"l | 5770
    undefined
    The Torah Perspective

    Secular Zionism in the Eyes of Rav Kook.

    How can we understand the rebellion against religion over the past century? What does the world gain spiritually from this rebellion which was foreseen in the mishna 1,800 years ago as part of the period preceding the mashiach? Only after we understand the rebellion can we glean the benefit and relate to our brothers properly.

    Rabbi Ari Shvat | 5769
    undefined
    Redemption - Geula

    When Moshiach Comes

    A summary of the different Brachot we will bless when the Moshiach will walk through the door.

    Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff | Iyar 5768
    undefined
    Marriage and Relationships

    The Role of Parents in Marriage

    Today, parents can fulfill the commandment of marrying off their children by providing them with a good education at prestigious schools, supporting them so that they be able to learn a profession, and clothing them in attractive attire.

    Rabbi Eliezer Melamed | 5764
את המידע הדפסתי באמצעות אתר yeshiva.org.il