- Jewish Laws and Thoughts
- Serving Hashem, Mitzvot and Repentance
666
All of this being said, Goldstone’s admission of error has a certain air of nobility to it. Shimon Peres has never admitted that Oslo was an error. Tzipi Livni or Ehud Olmert has never admitted that their support of the destruction of Gush Katif was badly mistaken. Ehud Barak has never revisited his shameful abandonment of Lebanon which has led to wars and the rise of Hezbollah. In our country all of our leaders, religious, governmental, social, societal and educational are never wrong. There is no personal accountability for errors in judgment and policy. It is only the criminal behavior of our leadership that eventually brings them down but even then there is scant evidence of admission of guilt or of apology to the long suffering public. They are all innocent even when found to be guilty. The necessity for admitting guilt and identifying one’s sins of commission and omission is a central tenet of Judaism. The Torah teaches us that no one individual, great as that person may be, is truly infallible. Jewish tradition teaches us that the main difference between Saul and David lay in Saul’s inability to admit his error in the war against Amalek while David publicly admitted his errors and sins. Judaism recognizes that people in leadership roles make mistakes. Such is our human condition. But it always demands accountability and remorse from those leaders for those errors. Therefore in effect it is this second statement of Richard Goldstone, his admission of error, which should serve as a reprimand to our society and its leaders.
King Solomon in Proverbs states that "one who admits [errors] and forsakes repeating them will be mercifully pardoned." Without personal admission of error there can be no pardon or forgiveness. The High Priest of Israel had to confess his own personal shortcomings on Yom Kippur before he could beseech Heaven for forgiveness on behalf of all of Israel. One sees throughout rabbinic literature the willingness of great men to admit that they overlooked something or that they erred in their judgment or logic in a previous decision. We see numerous instances in rabbinic responsa where a later response to an issue admits that the original response was wrong and should no longer be followed. Every author will tell you that if it were not for the insistence of the editor of his or her work no precious original word of that work would have been changed or corrected. It is difficult to erase or delete. It is even more difficult to admit to one’s self, let alone publicly, that one has made an error. Judge Goldstone has perhaps redeemed his name from eternal infamy in Jewish history by this statement retracting his earlier judgment regarding Israeli actions against Hamas in Gaza. It is not my task to decide what type of action he should take to try and undo the effects of his original report. But I feel he is to be complimented for issuing this new statement on the matter and owning up to the error that originally was his. Would that there would be more that would emulate him in this regard.
Our Generation's "Teshuva From Love"
Rabbi Zalman Baruch Melamed | Elul 5 5781
Life is Valuable- Even of the Unconscious
Ein Aya Shabat Chapter B Paragraph 36 (p2)
Rabbi Ari Shvat | Tamuz 13 5774
A Tale of Two Mothers
Rabbi Yoel Gold | Cheshvan 26 5782
Fear of Elul
Rabbi Yaakov Asher Sinclair | Elul 15 5781

An Exciting Genetic Jewish Marker
Rabbi Yossef Carmel | Kislev 26 5777

What Bracha Do I Make Before Smelling the Shavuos Flowers?
Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff | 5772

What Bracha Do I Make Before Smelling the Shavuos Flowers?
Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff | 5772

The Ethic of Holiness
Rabbi Jonathan Sacks

"FIND MY SPOUSE"- Kohanim Can also Help!
Rabbi Ari Shvat | Sivan 5785
Daf Yomi Shevuot Daf 36
R' Eli Stefansky | 10 Sivan 5785

The Land of Israel's Special Light, as Reflected in the Priestly Blessing
Rabbi Moshe Tzuriel | 10 Sivan 5785
