Moshe Rabbeinu was the first dayan. When Yitro’s advice to appoint more dayanim was accepted, the chain of existing dayanim giving semicha to new ones began. These judges are called dayanim semuchim, whereas even a knowledgeable dayan who lacks authentic semicha is called a dayan hedyot. Some areas that can be dealt with only by semuchim include capital and corporal punishment, levying penalty payments, declaring the new month, and deciding on leap years.
Why would someone who knows how to rule be disallowed if he lacks semicha? The K’tzot Hachoshen (3:1) says that the issue is not the ability to decide matters but the authority to enforce a ruling when both sides do not accept it. When they accept the judges and the judgment, the Torah does not require semuchim. Capital and corporal punishment are forced upon the person who is judged, thus explaining why semuchim are required. The same idea applies to matters of a public nature.
The uninterrupted chain of semicha from dayan to dayan ended during the period of the Amoraim. How then, will we have semuchim at the time of Mashiach? Will it require the resurrection of deceased semuchim? The Rambam (Sanhedrin 4:11) suggests that if all of the scholars of Eretz Yisrael agree to appoint dayanim and give them semicha, this will be effective, thus creating semicha that can then be passed on to others. The loss of semicha was seen as a tragedy because the dispersed nation found it difficult to get everyone together to agree to carry out the process.
The Rambam reasons that this must be the case because Hashem promised to return our judges as of old. Since Mashiach cannot change the Torah, he cannot create a process that does not exist. Therefore, there thus must be an existing mechanism and, indeed, the re-advent of the Sanhedrin will be a harbinger of the coming of Mashiach. One could argue that just as Moshe was the recognized Torah authority and thus was the head of the courts who could give semicha, so too in the future an authoritative leader would assume this position.
At different times in history there have been attempts to implement the Rambam’s suggestion (in the Mishneh Torah, his view on implementation is vague). The most famous and serious attempt was done in Tzfat at the time of the Mahari Beir Rav (16th century), when his colleagues gave him semicha. This was opposed by the community in Yerushalayim, headed by the Maharalbach. He opposed on fundamental grounds, as many disagree with the Rambam and say semicha will return only with the coming of Mashiach. They also argued that all of the scholars of Eretz Yisrael would have to come together in agreement, whereas at that time, the scholars of Tzfat did the whole thing themselves.
Unfortunately, despite more recent efforts by Rav Yisrael Mishiklov and Rav Maimion, we are still without semuchim.
P'ninat Mishpat (606)
Various Rabbis
93 - The Manner in Which a Shomer Becomes Obligated
94 - Dayanim With Authentic Semicha
95 - How Do We Judge These Days?
Load More
Why would someone who knows how to rule be disallowed if he lacks semicha? The K’tzot Hachoshen (3:1) says that the issue is not the ability to decide matters but the authority to enforce a ruling when both sides do not accept it. When they accept the judges and the judgment, the Torah does not require semuchim. Capital and corporal punishment are forced upon the person who is judged, thus explaining why semuchim are required. The same idea applies to matters of a public nature.
The uninterrupted chain of semicha from dayan to dayan ended during the period of the Amoraim. How then, will we have semuchim at the time of Mashiach? Will it require the resurrection of deceased semuchim? The Rambam (Sanhedrin 4:11) suggests that if all of the scholars of Eretz Yisrael agree to appoint dayanim and give them semicha, this will be effective, thus creating semicha that can then be passed on to others. The loss of semicha was seen as a tragedy because the dispersed nation found it difficult to get everyone together to agree to carry out the process.
The Rambam reasons that this must be the case because Hashem promised to return our judges as of old. Since Mashiach cannot change the Torah, he cannot create a process that does not exist. Therefore, there thus must be an existing mechanism and, indeed, the re-advent of the Sanhedrin will be a harbinger of the coming of Mashiach. One could argue that just as Moshe was the recognized Torah authority and thus was the head of the courts who could give semicha, so too in the future an authoritative leader would assume this position.
At different times in history there have been attempts to implement the Rambam’s suggestion (in the Mishneh Torah, his view on implementation is vague). The most famous and serious attempt was done in Tzfat at the time of the Mahari Beir Rav (16th century), when his colleagues gave him semicha. This was opposed by the community in Yerushalayim, headed by the Maharalbach. He opposed on fundamental grounds, as many disagree with the Rambam and say semicha will return only with the coming of Mashiach. They also argued that all of the scholars of Eretz Yisrael would have to come together in agreement, whereas at that time, the scholars of Tzfat did the whole thing themselves.
Unfortunately, despite more recent efforts by Rav Yisrael Mishiklov and Rav Maimion, we are still without semuchim.
